2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1364668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning superconducting quantum interference device susceptometry

Abstract: We report a scanning superconducting quantum interference device ͑SQUID͒ microsusceptometer with a spatial resolution of 8 m, tested by measuring the susceptibility of individual 3 m diam tin disks. Images of the disks agree well with numerical modeling based on the known geometry of the SQUID microsusceptometers. The low-field spin sensitivity between 1.5 and 6 K is 1 ϫ10 5 B /ͱHz while scanning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use scanning SQUID microscopy 20,21 to magnetically image many samples (Methods), primarily a series with varying LAO thickness. Figure 1a-d show representative examples of the magnetic landscapes for four thicknesses of the LAO layer.…”
Section: Magnetic Squid Imaging Of Samples With Varying Lao Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use scanning SQUID microscopy 20,21 to magnetically image many samples (Methods), primarily a series with varying LAO thickness. Figure 1a-d show representative examples of the magnetic landscapes for four thicknesses of the LAO layer.…”
Section: Magnetic Squid Imaging Of Samples With Varying Lao Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20]). We used a variable-T scanning SQUID susceptometer [37][38][39] with two field coil / pickup loop pairs in a gradiometer configuration. Figure 1a shows the sensing region 3 of the probe, which was polished to a corner to bring it as close as possible to the sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pickup loops have diameters down to ∼ 4 µm and are connected via well shielded superconducting thin film leads to the SQUID loop at typically ∼ 1 mm distance on the same chip 145 . This technology has also been used to realize a miniature vector magnetometer for SSM by using three SQUIDs with orthogonal pickup loops on a single chip 146 58,59 . Based on the original microsusceptometer design of Ketchen et al 44 , these devices contain two oppositely wound pickup coils, to cancel homogeneous applied fields.…”
Section: Nanosquids For Scanning Squid Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This susceptometer was operated in a dilution refrigerator, and the output signal was measured in open-loop configuration and amplified by an rf SQUID preamplifier. Magnetic susceptibility measurements performed with this system will be reviewed in section IV C. Very similar devices based on Nb/Al-AlO x /Nb JJs with √ S Φ = 0.8 µΦ 0 / √ Hz at 4 K and 0.25 µΦ 0 / √ Hz below 0.5 K were adapted to the use in scanning SQUID microscopes 58,59 ; see section V. Broad-band SQUID microsusceptometers have been realized by locally modifying SQUID current sensors based on Nb/Al-AlO x /Nb JJ technology. Those sensors 60 come in two types: (i) high-input inductance (∼ 1 µH) sensors incorporate an intermediate transformer loop with gradiometric design; (ii) low-input inductance (2 nH) devices without intermediate loop; here the input signal is directly coupled to the SQUID via four single-turn gradiometric coils connected in parallel.…”
Section: µMmentioning
confidence: 99%