2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning to conclusions? Visual attention to neutral faces under stress in individuals with and without subclinical paranoia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supporting this conceptualization, individuals with paranoid beliefs have been found to misclassify faces with neutral emotional expressions as angry 25 27 and rate them as less trustworthy 28 30 compared to those without such beliefs (but see 31 – 33 ). However, these findings are based on explicit ratings derived from individuals’ percepts , thus failing to disentangle the relative impact of prior beliefs and sensory inputs on perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Supporting this conceptualization, individuals with paranoid beliefs have been found to misclassify faces with neutral emotional expressions as angry 25 27 and rate them as less trustworthy 28 30 compared to those without such beliefs (but see 31 – 33 ). However, these findings are based on explicit ratings derived from individuals’ percepts , thus failing to disentangle the relative impact of prior beliefs and sensory inputs on perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To our knowledge, few eye movement studies of clinical high-risk populations exist. Hillmann et al showed that individuals with subclinical paranoia had a significantly shorter scanpath and a decrease of scanpath length under stress when looking at neutral faces compared with individuals without paranoia;11 this is similar to the eye movement features found in patients with recent onset of psychosis 6–8. Another recent study of patients at clinical high-risk for psychosis tracked eye movement to gesture perception and reported that those at clinical high-risk gazed at abstract gestures fewer times and spent less time fixating than controls 12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%