2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2005.07.318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy on κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to early specific heat measurements that supported swave pairing 88,89 , more recent measurements are consistent with a nodal order parameter 90 . Microwave penetration depth measurements 91,92 as well as STM tunneling experiments [93][94][95][96][97][98] are also consistent with nodes.…”
Section: Symmetry Of Superconducting Order Parametersupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In contrast to early specific heat measurements that supported swave pairing 88,89 , more recent measurements are consistent with a nodal order parameter 90 . Microwave penetration depth measurements 91,92 as well as STM tunneling experiments [93][94][95][96][97][98] are also consistent with nodes.…”
Section: Symmetry Of Superconducting Order Parametersupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For example, the zero-bias conductance peak (ZBCP) in the tunneling spectrum of high T c superconductors [4][5][6] has been ascribed to the zero-energy bound states. ZBCP has been also observed in other superconductors, such as Sr 2 RuO 4 , 7) -(BEDT-TTF) 2 Cu[N(CN) 2 ]Br, 8) UBe 13 , 9) and CeCoIn 5 , 10) and was regarded as evidence of their unconventionality. The surface bound states in p-wave pairing superfluid 3 He 1,2,11-13) have not been observed until recently, because of the lack of an appropriate probe for the neutral superfluid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For -(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br (-Br for short): measurements of scanning tunnel spectroscopy (STS) were interpreted as strongly supporting d-wave pairing with line nodes (Ichimura et al [604]); measurements (Mayaffre et al [605]) of NMR 1/T1 ~ T 3 indicate strongly anisotropric superconducting gap or maybe nodes, with no Hebel Schlichter peak in 1/T1 below Tc, i. e. arguing against s-wave; measurements (De Soto et al [606]) of NMR indicate unconventional pairing, possible nodes; measurements (Kanoda et al [607]) of NMR indicate UcS with strong gap anisotropy and possibly nodes; measurements in -Br and -(ET)2Cu(NCS)2 (-NCS for short) (Le et al [608]) of penetration depth ~T consistent with line nodes; measurements (Achkir et al [609]) in -NCS of penetration depth imply line nodes and UcS; measurements (Dressel et al [610]) in -Br and -NCS of surface impedance indicate an anisotropic superconducting gap but without nodes in the gap; measurements (Taylor, Carrington and Schlueter [611]) in -Br and -NCS of the specific heat C~T both indicate d-wave pairing symmetry; measurements (Milbradt et al [612]) in -Br of surface impedance indicate d-wave behavior.…”
Section: Dmentioning
confidence: 99%