2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scano-magneto immunoassay based on carbon nanotubes/gold nanoparticles nanocomposite for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that if the plasma was not diluted, the LOD only reached 0.4 ng/mL, while for diluted plasma the LOD reached 0.1 ng/mL ( Figure 2A ). The difference may be due to interference by proteins or lipids in the plasma ( 15 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed that if the plasma was not diluted, the LOD only reached 0.4 ng/mL, while for diluted plasma the LOD reached 0.1 ng/mL ( Figure 2A ). The difference may be due to interference by proteins or lipids in the plasma ( 15 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highly variable natures of these different food matrices pose a challenge to BoNTs detection ( 3 , 12 ). For antigen-antibody reactions, it has previously been reported that the acidity of freshly squeezed orange juice and the fat or casein in milk can affect antigen-antibody binding, which could negatively affect the assay ( 15 ). To reduce the effects of the food matrix, some studies isolated, tested, and quantified toxins from food samples ( 3 , 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study using an immunochromatographic strip assay combined with signal amplification using liposome vesicles showed the detection limit to be 100 CFU/mL (Shukla et al, 2011). Other immunoassays reported lower detection limits of 10-50 CFU/mL (Amaro et al, 2012;Chattopadhyay et al, 2013). However, these methods require longer assay times, or more expensive and labor-intensive assay platform fabrication and/or sample preparation steps and expensive instrumentation.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Imb-based Fluorescence Assaymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Laube et al used phagoomagnetic immunoassay to detect S. Typhimurium in LB broth and milk, and obtained detection limits of 10 and 19 CFU/mL without any pre-enrichment step, respectively, which indicates the sensitivity of the assay decreased by nearly twofold in food testing (Laube et al, 2014). Similarly, Amaro et al detected S. Typhimurium in various food samples, including chicken broth, low fat milk and freshly squeezed orange juice, using scano-magneto immunoassay based on a nano-composite (Amaro et al, 2012). They found the sensitivity of the assay significantly decreased with food samples with detection limits of 838 CFU/mL (chicken broth), 3.2 3 10 3 CFU/mL (low fat milk), 3.7 3 10 4 CFU/ mL (orange juice) and 3.7 3 10 4 CFU/mL (whole milk), compared to 42 CFU/mL in buffer.…”
Section: Detection Of Salmonella In Food Samplesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The transducers convert detectable biological recognition signals such as color change, fluorescence signal, and electrochemical signals. Nanomaterials such as gold nanoparticle (AuNP) [ 20 , 21 ], magnetic nanoparticle (MNPs) [ 22 ], quantum dot (QDs), carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [ 23 , 24 , 25 ], and carbon nanotubes with coupled gold nanoparticles (MWCNTs/AuNPs) [ 26 ] are the signal transduction elements [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%