Scapulohumeral rhythm in patients after total shoulder arthroplasty compared to age-matched healthy individuals

Bruttel, Hendrik; Spranz, David M.; Wolf, Sebastian I.; Maier, Michael W.

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.08.111

Cited by 5 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fifteen full-text articles were then screened, leading to the elimination of four studies. At the end of the selection process, a total of 11 articles were considered eligible for this study [17][18][19][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The PRISMA flowchart of the literature search is reported in Figure 1.…”

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, the aim of the study, the degrees of freedom, the kinematic outcomes, and the main findings were also extrapolated and reported in Table 3. [17,23] are the same, so, they were counted once.…”

Section: Data Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the 11 included studies, 6 were cohort studies (CS) of III LOE [17,23,25,27,29,30], 1 was a case series (CAS) of III LOE [18], 2 were retrospective cohort (RCS) studies of III LOE [19,26], 1 was a cross sectional study (CRS) of IV LOE [28], and 1 was a Prospective Laboratory Study (PLS) of III LOE [24]. No RCTs were included in this review.…”

Section: Study Characteristics and Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Patients presented the following conditions: glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GOA) in 33 patients [17,18], SAI in 12 patients [24], scapular dyskinesis in 51 patients [28], and RCTA in 34 patients [27,30]. Moreover, studies included 26 patients who underwent aTSA [17,23,26] and 47 patients who underwent RTSA [19,25,29]. Five studies included a healthy control group [17,23,26,27,30], for a total of 55 healthy subjects to compare 3D shoulder kinematics with patients with shoulder musculoskeletal disorders.…”

Section: Study Characteristics and Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Optical Motion Capture Systems for 3D Kinematic Analysis in Patients with Shoulder Disorders

Longo

Salvatore

Carnevale

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Shoulder dysfunctions represent the third musculoskeletal disorder by frequency. However, monitoring the movement of the shoulder is particularly challenging due to the complexity of the joint kinematics. The 3D kinematic analysis with optical motion capture systems (OMCs) makes it possible to overcome clinical tests’ shortcomings and obtain objective data on the characteristics and quality of movement. This systematic review aims to retrieve the current knowledge about using OMCs for 3D shoulder kinematic analysis in patients with musculoskeletal shoulder disorders and their corresponding clinical relevance. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to improve the reporting of the review. Studies employing OMCs for 3D kinematic analysis in patients with musculoskeletal shoulder disorders were retrieved. Eleven articles were considered eligible for this study. OMCs can be considered a powerful tool in orthopedic clinical research. The high costs and organizing complexities of experimental setups are likely outweighed by the impact of these systems in guiding clinical practice and patient follow-up. However, additional high-quality studies on using OMCs in clinical practice are required, with standardized protocols and methodologies to make comparing clinical trials easier.

show abstract

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Data Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristics and Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristics and Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Optical Motion Capture Systems for 3D Kinematic Analysis in Patients with Shoulder Disorders

Longo

Salvatore

Carnevale

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In our study, strength balance may not have differed between deformity groups because there was unexpectedly higher variability in the eccentric group than in the concentric group. Greater variation in strength balance in patients with eccentric deformities may be owing to alterations in joint kinematics [7,15] or muscle activation patterns adopted to compensate for underlying anatomic changes in the setting of a deformity. Higher variability in strength balance may also be attributed to patients with existing subtypes of eccentric glenoid wear patterns (posterior-superior, posterior-central, and posteriorinferior [32]) compensating differently and may potentially explain why TSA failure rates are technique-dependent [26].…”

Section: Differences In External Rotation Strength Between Eccentric ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

No Strength Differences Despite Greater Posterior Rotator Cuff Intramuscular Fat in Patients With Eccentric Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Coats-Thomas

Baillargeon

Ludvig

et al. 2022

Clin Orthop Relat Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundWhen nonoperative measures do not alleviate the symptoms of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), patients with advanced OA primarily are treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). It is unknown why TSAs performed in patients with eccentric (asymmetric glenoid wear) compared with concentric (symmetric glenoid wear) deformities exhibit higher failure rates, despite surgical advances. Persistent disruption of the posterior-to-anterior rotator cuff (RC) force couple resulting from posterior RC intramuscular degeneration in patients with eccentric deformities could impair external rotation strength and may contribute to eventual TSA failure. Pain and intramuscular fat within the RC muscles may impact external rotation strength measures and are important to consider.Questions/purposes(1) Is there relative shoulder external rotation weakness in patients with eccentric compared with concentric deformities? (2) Is there higher resting or torque-dependent pain in patients with eccentric compared with concentric deformities? (3) Do patients with eccentric deformities have higher posterior-to-anterior RC intramuscular fat percent ratios than patients with concentric deformities?MethodsFrom February 2020 to November 2021, 65% (52 of 80) of patients with OA met study eligibility criteria. Of these, 63% (33 of 52) of patients enrolled and provided informed consent. From a convenience sample of 21 older adults with no history of shoulder pain, 20 met eligibility criteria as control participants. Of the convenience sample, 18 patients enrolled and provided informed consent. In total for this prospective, cross-sectional study, across patients with OA and control participants, 50% (51 of 101) of participants were enrolled and allocated into the eccentric (n = 16), concentric (n = 17), and control groups (n = 18). A 3-degree-of-freedom load cell was used to sensitively quantify strength in all three dimensions surrounding the shoulder. Participants performed maximal isometric contractions in 26 1-, 2-, and 3-degree-of-freedom direction combinations involving adduction/abduction, internal/external rotation, and/or flexion/extension. To test for relative external rotation weakness, we quantified relative strength in opposing directions (three-dimensional [3D] strength balance) along the X (+adduction/-abduction), Y (+internal/-external rotation), and Z (+flexion/-extension) axes and compared across the three groups. Patients with OA rated their shoulder pain (numerical rating 0-10) before testing at rest (resting pain; response to “How bad is your pain today?”) and with each maximal contraction (torque-dependent pain; numerical rating 0-10). Resting and torque-dependent pain were compared between patients with eccentric and concentric deformities to determine if pain was higher in the eccentric group. The RC cross-sectional areas and intramuscular fat percentages were quantified on Dixon-sequence MRIs by a single observer who performed manual segmentation using previously validated methods. Ratios of poste...

show abstract

Biomechanics of the shoulder joint

Pria

2022

Human Orthopaedic Biomechanics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scapulohumeral rhythm in patients after total shoulder arthroplasty compared to age-matched healthy individuals

Cited by 5 publications

References 33 publications

Optical Motion Capture Systems for 3D Kinematic Analysis in Patients with Shoulder Disorders

Optical Motion Capture Systems for 3D Kinematic Analysis in Patients with Shoulder Disorders

No Strength Differences Despite Greater Posterior Rotator Cuff Intramuscular Fat in Patients With Eccentric Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Biomechanics of the shoulder joint

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About