Scapulohumeral rhythm in young tennis players

Gillet, Benoît; Begon, Mickaël; Blache, Yoann; Berger‐Vachon, Christian; Rogowski, Isabelle

doi:10.1080/10255842.2017.1382877

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Repetitive movements and strain on the anterior part of the shoulder girdle (i.e. pushing and tackling opponents, ball throwing, weight lifting with emphasis on the protracting muscle groups) can create imbalance and reduced glenohumeral rotation among athletes (42) . This represents a risk factor for shoulder injuries among elite handball players but studies analyzing risk factors for shoulder injuries have shown conflicting results and our results should therefore be interpreted with caution and researched further (13,43,44) .…”

Section: Screening Testsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characteristics of functional movement screening testing in elite handball players: Indicative data from the 9+

Rafnsson

Myklebust

Bahr

et al. 2019

Physical Therapy in Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:To test 9+ screening batterie's intra-rater reliability, to provide indicative data of elite handball players, and to analyze difference between age, playing positions and level of play. Design: Descriptive studySetting: Icelandic elite male handball players Participants: 182 elite male handball players. Main Outcome Measures: Nine+ screening battery.Results: Reliability test: Intra-class correlation for the total score was 0.95. The correlation of each of the test factors varied from 0.63 to 0.91. The mean total score was 22.3±2.9 (95%CI 16.7-28.1), with no difference in total score comparing players age or level of play. Goalkeepers displayed a higher total score than other players (F3,151=5.75, p=0.001). Junior players had a lower score than senior players in tests measuring abdominal strength and core stability; Test 5;  2 (3, 182)=41.5, p<0.0001, Test 6;  2 (3, 182)=55.7, p<0.0001, Test 7;  2 (3, 182)=11.8, p<0.005, but higher scores in tests measuring trunk and shoulder mobility Test 8;  2 (3, 182)=18.2, p<0.0001, Test 9;  2 (3, 182)=22.2, p=0.006. Conclusions:The 9+ intra-rater reliability was acceptable for the total score and individual tests. Age-related differences were provided in many individual tests.

show abstract