1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb04060.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scar Resurfacing with High-Energy, Short-pulsed and Flashscanning Carbon Dioxide Lasers

Abstract: The high-energy, short-pulsed CO2 laser and the continuous wave CO2 laser with flash-scanning attachment are safe and effective as a treatment modality for scar revision. In general, elevated scars improve more dramatically than depressed scars.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This advantage over non-fractional ablative devices partially explains the apparent reduction in patient downtime, such as persistent erythema and infection risk. Unlike non-fractional CO 2 laser treatments, which may result in post-treatment erythema lasting several months [27,28], erythema subsided within 4-7 days after AFR TM treatment for all study patients. Furthermore, no clinical infections were observed in any subject on follow-up examinations after treatments on the forearm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This advantage over non-fractional ablative devices partially explains the apparent reduction in patient downtime, such as persistent erythema and infection risk. Unlike non-fractional CO 2 laser treatments, which may result in post-treatment erythema lasting several months [27,28], erythema subsided within 4-7 days after AFR TM treatment for all study patients. Furthermore, no clinical infections were observed in any subject on follow-up examinations after treatments on the forearm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Initially, several reports were supportive of laser treatment; however, later results did not show significant advantages compared with use of a scalpel. Keloids excised using a carbon dioxide laser have been reported to have recurrence rates between 50% and 70%, 8 11 reported improved surface scar contour when treating keloids and hypertrophic scars in 24 patients with the high-energy, short-pulsed carbon dioxide laser and the scanned continuous-wave carbon dioxide laser. 11 Temporary adverse effects include erythema and hypopigmentation.…”
Section: Lawrencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The papillary dermis is affected to a minimum in newer lasers. The superpulsed lasers based on selective photothermolysis result in pure steam vaporisation and the adjacent tissue is affected 142 doi:10.18282/jsd.v2.it1.137 minimally [12] Ultrapulse CO 2 lasers for midfacial region are treated with 90 mJ/45W with first-pass density setting of 7, and less for the upper and lower eyelids and even lesser for hairline and jawline. In the second pass, lesser density is required as compared to the first.…”
Section: Ablative Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%