2019
DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1597983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scarce evidence of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in necrotizing soft tissue infection: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors recommend the use of HBOT in NSTI 11,62 . However, in a literature review on the efficacy of HBOT in necrotizing soft tissue infections, Faunø et al found "poor and biased" evidence and the need for randomized controlled trials 63 . The same conclusion was drawn by Anheuser et al, who carried out a retrospective multicenter analysis of the influence of HBO on Fournier's gangrene 64 .…”
Section: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors recommend the use of HBOT in NSTI 11,62 . However, in a literature review on the efficacy of HBOT in necrotizing soft tissue infections, Faunø et al found "poor and biased" evidence and the need for randomized controlled trials 63 . The same conclusion was drawn by Anheuser et al, who carried out a retrospective multicenter analysis of the influence of HBO on Fournier's gangrene 64 .…”
Section: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may lead to some bias in the analysis, but prospective randomized studies would not be ethical for this condition as this method is already classically used and leads to benefits; thus, depriving patients of treatment would not be recommended. 54 Another aspect that may have influenced and caused some bias in the results is the fact that not all patients were operated on by the same surgeon and in the same department, which may lead to differences. However, groups I and II were similar in terms of age, comorbidities and anatomical severity classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies investigating its impact on outcome of NSTI demonstrated positive effects [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], whereas others did not show significant benefit [30][31][32][33][34]. Past systematic reviews provided only limited evidence on the clinical advantages of HBOT and had difficulties performing reliable meta-analyses due to shortcomings in the design and limited cohort sizes of included studies, high risk of confounding, substantial study heterogeneity and poor concordance of inclusion criteria [4,5,35,36]. According to the latest meta-analysis, HBOT improves the odds for survival of NSTI [11].…”
Section: Impact Of Hbotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, high oxygen levels ameliorate tissue regeneration and improve the efficacy of antibiotics, especially in biofilm forming microbes [ 3 ]. However, evidence for the benefits of HBOT in terms of survival and clinical outcome of patients with NF and FG is still limited [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%