2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1049-250x(03)80007-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering and Reaction Processes in Powerful Laser Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 519 publications
0
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The topics to be considered have been covered by many more general review papers [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Some historical remarks can be found in [39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topics to be considered have been covered by many more general review papers [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Some historical remarks can be found in [39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(31)- (33)] for the Coulomb factor in the probability amplitude for nonlinear ionization by a lowfrequency intense laser field for the case in which the Keldysh parameter γ is small. We have also presented detailed applications of our general formulas to the important special cases of LP and CP laser fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods include the numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE); exactly solvable models such as the quasistationary quasienergy states approach (QQES) for the zero-range potential [28]; the adiabatic approximation [29][30][31]; the S-matrix approach [32][33][34][35]; the Keldysh theory [18,36,37] or, equivalently, the strong field approximation [38,39]; and the simple man (classical) model (SMM) [40]. Although exact, the TDSE approach presents two difficulties: it is highly demanding of computational resources, particularly for fields having long wavelengths or polarizations other than linear, and it provides little insight into the physics of a problem without extensive, time-consuming additional calculations to explore the relevant parameter space.…”
Section: Overview Of Theoretical Methods For Strong Field Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The price one has to pay, however, is that the HHG cutoff decreases in accordance with the classical law ω cut−off = I p + 3.17U p , where both U p and saturation intensity I sat must necessarily be smaller. One way to circumvent this obstacle and to even enhance the cutoff is to consider HHG originating from a superposition of an excited and a ground state [40,41] or excited vibrational states in molecules [42] -for the more recent developments of these ideas see [43][44][45]. Another, easier way is to scale the intensity and the laser wavelength (frequency) in accordance with I p .…”
Section: W/cmmentioning
confidence: 99%