2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.75.184510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering by magnetic and spin-orbit impurities and the Josephson current in superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor junctions

Abstract: We analyze the Josephson current in a junction consisting of two superconductors (S) and a ferromagnetic layer (F) for arbitrary impurity concentration. In addition to non-magnetic impurities, we consider also magnetic ones and spin-orbit scattering. In the limit of weak proximity effect we solve the linearized Eilenberger equation and derive an analytical expression for the Josephson critical current valid in a broad range of parameters. This expression enables us to obtain not only known results in the dirty… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…spin-flip scattering, as seen from Eq. (29). The above analysis emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between different types of spin-dependent scattering in terms of understanding the behaviour of the DOS in a ferromagnet/superconductor bilayer.…”
Section: Anomalous Green's Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…spin-flip scattering, as seen from Eq. (29). The above analysis emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between different types of spin-dependent scattering in terms of understanding the behaviour of the DOS in a ferromagnet/superconductor bilayer.…”
Section: Anomalous Green's Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be attributed to the strong suppression of Andreev bound states due to spin-flip scattering processes, which are usually not taken into account in the theoretical treatment (see, however, Ref. 29). To date, there exists no study of the density of states in F/S structures that allows access to both the full range of barrier transparencies and concentration of magnetic impurities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scattering times are labeled here as τ z , τ x , and τ so , where τ z(x) corresponds to the magnetic scattering parallel (perpendicular) to the quantization axis, and τ so is the spin-orbit scattering time. [38][39][40][41] We consider here ferromagnets with a strong uniaxial anisotropy, in which case the magnetic scattering does not couple the spin-up and spin-down electron populations; i.e., the perpendicular fluctuations of the exchange field are suppressed (τ −1 x ∼ 0). Therefore, we will neglect τ x in our consideration and denote τ z as a magnetic scattering time τ m .…”
Section: Model and Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function g 2 is in the same channel as∆, and thus encodes the s-wave pairing correlations. The g 1 function has more interesting origin -it describes the p-wave, odd-frequency superconducting correlations, induced by boundaries or other inhomogeneities, and disappearing in bulk uniform superconductors [24][25][26][27] . The component g 1 is odd in momentum, therefore its Fermi surface average vanishes identically g 1 = 0.…”
Section: The S-wave Casementioning
confidence: 99%