1983
DOI: 10.1137/0143093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering by Weakly Nonlinear Objects

Abstract: An attempt is made to construct a consistent scattering theory for systems involving nonlinear objects. Weak nonlinearity is assumed, such that harmonic generation is present, but shock wave formation is excluded. Mathematically this is described by constitutive relations in the form of Volterra series. For periodic (as opposed to monochromatic) waves, this procedure facilitates algebraic constitutive relations and dispersion equations in the transform space. Weak nonlinearity, as defined here, implies phase m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main objective of this example is to evaluate the capabilities of the iterative approaches versus the statistical cooling solution. However, it is worth noting that, only for circular cylinders, results obtained by the distorted-wave Born approximation have already been compared in [9] with those obtained by Hasan and Uslenghi [13] by using a per-turbation method and with those obtained by Censor [14] by using an iterative method. Figure 1 gives the values for k = 1 , k = 2 , and k = k * (this value of k turned out to be sufficient for the assumed convergence, i.e., at step k * the residual error {k * } turned out to be less than a fixed threshold value, th ; in all the simulations, we assumed th = 10 −4 ).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of this example is to evaluate the capabilities of the iterative approaches versus the statistical cooling solution. However, it is worth noting that, only for circular cylinders, results obtained by the distorted-wave Born approximation have already been compared in [9] with those obtained by Hasan and Uslenghi [13] by using a per-turbation method and with those obtained by Censor [14] by using an iterative method. Figure 1 gives the values for k = 1 , k = 2 , and k = k * (this value of k turned out to be sufficient for the assumed convergence, i.e., at step k * the residual error {k * } turned out to be less than a fixed threshold value, th ; in all the simulations, we assumed th = 10 −4 ).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some equations might be solved by directly substituting a solution of the form a(X)6(G(X)), for others b(X) as in (24) will be chosen and the limit p -oo performed later, or a suitable large value for p will be retained. The first two exponential solutions given in (24) are of special interest.…”
Section: The Solitary Wave and Group Slowness Concepts In Nondismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sinc function in the third line (24) does not display this convenient feature. In all three cases, however, we are interested in the behavior of G = G(X) near G = 0.…”
Section: The Solitary Wave and Group Slowness Concepts In Nondismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts of defining nonlinear constitutive parameters from first principles usually lead to Volterra's series of functionals [17,18]. For additional literature references and related work see [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. A postulated model [29], applied to numerical simulation of rays in nonlinear media, was used in conjunction with experimental data [30] given in the literature, and close agreement of the experimental and simulation results was found.…”
Section: Nonlinear Constitutive Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practical meaning of a differential operator as in the special case (21), is that the operator should be substituted in the equation (first eq. (21) in the present case), and both sides judiciously manipulated and multiplied by the inverse operator, in order to finally obtain a conventional differential equation.…”
Section: Constitutive Relations In the Comoving Framementioning
confidence: 99%