2011
DOI: 10.3813/aaa.918438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering-Matrix Formulation for Both Measurement and Prediction of Acoustical Performances of Hybrid Cells and Their Active and Passive Elements

Abstract: The design of panels improving both sound absorption and insulation performance overawide frequencyrange is ap roblem of considerable practical interest for transport and building industries. In this work, an analytical method for predicting both the absorption coefficient and the transmission loss of hybrid active/passive multilayered cells and the associated experimental investigation are presented. These cells combine passive and active control by using passive layers and an active plate. Passive layers con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To characterize the acoustic behavior of duct discontinuities with rigid wall and lined parts, numerous methods were proposed like the work of Miles (1946), Peat (1988a;1988b), Munjal (1987), Kergomard and Garcia (1987), Amir et al (1996) and Selamet et al (2004). To evaluate the acoustic performance of ducts systems, different matrices were used such as the transfer matrix (Peat, 1988a;Munjal, 1987;Craggs, 1989), reflection matrix (Akoum, Ville, 1998;Sitel et al, 2003), transmission matrix (Sitel et al, 2003) or multimodal scattering matrix (Åbom, 1991;Leroux et al, 2003;Bi et al, 2006;Sitel et al, 2006). The latter matrix showed its efficiency in modeling duct elements and liner impedance at higher-order modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize the acoustic behavior of duct discontinuities with rigid wall and lined parts, numerous methods were proposed like the work of Miles (1946), Peat (1988a;1988b), Munjal (1987), Kergomard and Garcia (1987), Amir et al (1996) and Selamet et al (2004). To evaluate the acoustic performance of ducts systems, different matrices were used such as the transfer matrix (Peat, 1988a;Munjal, 1987;Craggs, 1989), reflection matrix (Akoum, Ville, 1998;Sitel et al, 2003), transmission matrix (Sitel et al, 2003) or multimodal scattering matrix (Åbom, 1991;Leroux et al, 2003;Bi et al, 2006;Sitel et al, 2006). The latter matrix showed its efficiency in modeling duct elements and liner impedance at higher-order modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantage of the absorptive structure is the deep-subwavelength size with the thickness less than the operating wavelength by up to two orders of magnitude [8,9]. In the current design, the active strategy, which has been widely implemented previously [19][20][21][22][23], is employed to render tunable peak absorption frequencies as an attempt to extend the bandwidth of the total acoustic absorption. To this end, two piezoelectric films (PZT-5H) of thickness 0.2 mm with the shunting circuits are bonded on both sides of the aluminum membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tunable sound absorption using active materials and structures has been studied for a long time [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. The active sound cancelation technique is the method for eliminating unwanted sounds by an additional feedforward control power source [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation