“…Recent measurements for this level by Smith [74] and Barnard [75] are notably discrepant from earlier results of Cranberg [76] and Glazkov [77]. The results of Smith indicate a much smaller cross section than Glazkov and form the basis for the present evaluation as shown in Figure 3. …”
Section: 310 Mev Levelcontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Recent measurements of the '^^"U inelastic scattering cross section by Smith [74] provide a check against the extensive measurements of Barnard [75] and Smith [73] as well as the measurements by Cranberg [76] and (61) Barnard's data and the level correspondence between the two measurements is not uniquely defined. The level structure adopted for this evaluation above the 1.12 MeV level represents a compromise level structure for which the cross sections can be reliably defined from the combined data of Smith [74] and Barnard [75].…”
“…The level structure adopted for this evaluation above the 1.12 MeV level represents a compromise level structure for which the cross sections can be reliably defined from the combined data of Smith [74] and Barnard [75]. No attempt has been made to assess the validity of the more detailed level structure indicated by Barnard The data by Smith [73,74] a number of angles.…”
“…No attempt has been made to assess the validity of the more detailed level structure indicated by Barnard The data by Smith [73,74] a number of angles. Barnard [75] reports values measured at an angle of 90° and were multiplied by 0.95 x 4TT to obtain total inelastic cross sections. The factor of 0.95 is an estimated correction for angular asymmetry based on angular distributions reported by Smith [73].…”
“…Above 1.15 MeV, the cross section has not been measured and extrapolation of the cross section is somewhat arbitrary. Calculations by Dunford [78] and Prince [79] For this level as well as all higher energy levels, the measurements of Barnard [75] have been multiplied by 47T (assumed to be isotropic) to obtain the total inelastic cross section for each level.…”
“…Recent measurements for this level by Smith [74] and Barnard [75] are notably discrepant from earlier results of Cranberg [76] and Glazkov [77]. The results of Smith indicate a much smaller cross section than Glazkov and form the basis for the present evaluation as shown in Figure 3. …”
Section: 310 Mev Levelcontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Recent measurements of the '^^"U inelastic scattering cross section by Smith [74] provide a check against the extensive measurements of Barnard [75] and Smith [73] as well as the measurements by Cranberg [76] and (61) Barnard's data and the level correspondence between the two measurements is not uniquely defined. The level structure adopted for this evaluation above the 1.12 MeV level represents a compromise level structure for which the cross sections can be reliably defined from the combined data of Smith [74] and Barnard [75].…”
“…The level structure adopted for this evaluation above the 1.12 MeV level represents a compromise level structure for which the cross sections can be reliably defined from the combined data of Smith [74] and Barnard [75]. No attempt has been made to assess the validity of the more detailed level structure indicated by Barnard The data by Smith [73,74] a number of angles.…”
“…No attempt has been made to assess the validity of the more detailed level structure indicated by Barnard The data by Smith [73,74] a number of angles. Barnard [75] reports values measured at an angle of 90° and were multiplied by 0.95 x 4TT to obtain total inelastic cross sections. The factor of 0.95 is an estimated correction for angular asymmetry based on angular distributions reported by Smith [73].…”
“…Above 1.15 MeV, the cross section has not been measured and extrapolation of the cross section is somewhat arbitrary. Calculations by Dunford [78] and Prince [79] For this level as well as all higher energy levels, the measurements of Barnard [75] have been multiplied by 47T (assumed to be isotropic) to obtain the total inelastic cross section for each level.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.