2017
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2016.2601244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering Performance of Log-Periodic Dipole Array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, τ, which is the ratio between the lengths of two adjacent dipole elements, is set to 0.85. The interested readers can refer to [30,31] in order to know how to design the LPDA element as a scatterer. A 50 Ω resistance is loaded with a feeding point of array elements, which is a different point with an ordinary reflectarray.…”
Section: Phase Of Reflection Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, τ, which is the ratio between the lengths of two adjacent dipole elements, is set to 0.85. The interested readers can refer to [30,31] in order to know how to design the LPDA element as a scatterer. A 50 Ω resistance is loaded with a feeding point of array elements, which is a different point with an ordinary reflectarray.…”
Section: Phase Of Reflection Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected in Section 3.1, relatively wide bandwidth of the Ninja array antenna with the LPDA element comes from wideband scattering performance of the LPDA element including linear phase shift. The wideband scattering performance of both the LPDA element and a reflectarray with the LPDA element has been described in [30,31].…”
Section: Scattering Performancementioning
confidence: 99%