2013
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/778/1/l6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering Polarization in Solar Flares

Abstract: There is an ongoing debate about the origin and even the very existence of a high degree of linear polarization of some chromospheric spectral lines observed in solar flares. The standard explanation of these measurements is in terms of the impact polarization caused by non-thermal proton and/or electron beams. In this work, we study the possible role of resonance line polarization due to radiation anisotropy in the inhomogeneous medium of the flare ribbons. We consider a simple two-dimensional model of the fl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-thermal particle beams and neutralizing return currents are generally cited as possible sources for an extra polarization signal. However, more recently, Štěpán & Heinzel (2013) showed that this polarization is not due to energetic particles impacting the chromosphere, but to a radiation anisotropy near the chromospheric ribbons. Since this polarization effect is mainly seen for chromospheric lines (e.g.…”
Section: Arguments Against Ribbon Artifacts From Polarization Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-thermal particle beams and neutralizing return currents are generally cited as possible sources for an extra polarization signal. However, more recently, Štěpán & Heinzel (2013) showed that this polarization is not due to energetic particles impacting the chromosphere, but to a radiation anisotropy near the chromospheric ribbons. Since this polarization effect is mainly seen for chromospheric lines (e.g.…”
Section: Arguments Against Ribbon Artifacts From Polarization Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At energies above 50 keV, the apparition of the X-ray source D' is accompanied with the appearance of cospatial photospheric currents in the same time interval. Note that the observation of the current density evolution has to be carefully examined since polarization measurements during flares can be biaised, and some of the observed features could result from polarization artifacts due to impact of non-thermal particle beams (see Hénoux & Karlický 2013, and references therein) or induced by resonant scattering due to radiation anisotropies at the edges of flare ribbons (Štěpán & Heinzel 2013). Janvier et al (2014) discussed this issue for this specific event.…”
Section: How To Interpret the Relation Between X-ray Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simply means that the atomic alignment for the 1083nm component is positive, which is entirely consistent with the calculations presented above ( Figure 6). Stěpán & Heinzel (2013) calculated polarization in a stratified atmosphere assuming a two dimensional geometry to study effects of asymmetries in radiation at the edges of flare ribbons. Our slab calculations are consistent with theirs away from the regions of strong horizontal gradients.…”
Section: Origin Of the Impulsive Phase Linear Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that λ is expected to be on the order of a pressure scale height, perhaps 10 2 km, far smaller than the ribbon's width of 3 Mm or more (Figure 1). Our work differs from Štěpán & Heinzel (2013) mainly through our assumption of a slab, and by the fact that we look at all three components of a multiplet sampling very different optical depths. The change in sign of alignment between the 1083 and 1082.9 nm components implied by Figure 6 is an entirely new and unexpected result.…”
Section: Origin Of the Impulsive Phase Linear Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%