Characterization of Biomaterials 2013
DOI: 10.1533/9780857093684.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering techniques for structural analysis of biomaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crystallization of the sample is considered good since the samples has highest and strongest peak of intensity. Besides, the full width at half-maximum is symmetrical narrow which is a proof of good crystallization [17] and [28]. UV Vis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The crystallization of the sample is considered good since the samples has highest and strongest peak of intensity. Besides, the full width at half-maximum is symmetrical narrow which is a proof of good crystallization [17] and [28]. UV Vis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Larger grains lead to larger grain boundary gaps that decrease the permselectivity by allowing all molecules to pass through. Additionally, larger grain sizes make the material brittle, thus the membrane becomes more prone to deformation [ 49 51 ]. Therefore, it can be expected to achieve a better stability and H 2 permselectivity with surfaces prepared using baths at 40 and 30 °C, disregarding the surface defects/cracks on sample prepared at 40 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, there was no change in the crystallite size at all. The size of the crystallites is typically considered to be a significant parameter, as the sizes of the crystals determine whether the material is soft (small crystallites) or brittle (big crystallites) [26]. In addition, the lattice strain increases as the size of the crystallite increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%