2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-017-2851-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scenario analysis of flood control structures using a multi-criteria decision-making technique in Northeast Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It complements approaches dealing with a singular risk. In the literature, several approaches have been proposed (Furlan et al, 2020), (Mostafazadeh et al, 2017), (Chatterjee et al, 2018). Our contribution in relation to these proposals is the qualification of risk scenarios by success indicators which allow decision making.…”
Section: Categories Of Project Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It complements approaches dealing with a singular risk. In the literature, several approaches have been proposed (Furlan et al, 2020), (Mostafazadeh et al, 2017), (Chatterjee et al, 2018). Our contribution in relation to these proposals is the qualification of risk scenarios by success indicators which allow decision making.…”
Section: Categories Of Project Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributed reservoirs have been shown to reduce the flow peak magnitudes based on distributed models (Chennu et al 2007;Del Giudice et al 2014), semi-distributed models (Ramireddygari et al 2000;Leblois et al 2010) and analytic analyses (Del Giudice et al 2014). Various studies have also used cost-benefit analysis for flood mitigation scenarios (Heidari 2009) or multi-criteria decision-making techniques (e.g., Ahmad and Simonovic 2006;Mostafazadeh et al 2017). The reductions in the flow peak in these related studies vary extensively within the range from 0.3 to 36% (Emerson et al 2005;Mostafazadeh et al 2017;Ravazzani et al 2014;Thomas 2015); however, in some cases of dry dams, the reduction in the flow peak was less than 50% (Chennu et al 2007).…”
Section: Structural Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have also used cost-benefit analysis for flood mitigation scenarios (Heidari 2009) or multi-criteria decision-making techniques (e.g., Ahmad and Simonovic 2006;Mostafazadeh et al 2017). The reductions in the flow peak in these related studies vary extensively within the range from 0.3 to 36% (Emerson et al 2005;Mostafazadeh et al 2017;Ravazzani et al 2014;Thomas 2015); however, in some cases of dry dams, the reduction in the flow peak was less than 50% (Chennu et al 2007). Onusluel Gul et al (2010) studied the use of concentrated dams to evaluate the impact of flood mitigations on a downstream area using a combination of hydraulic and hydrologic modelling.…”
Section: Structural Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the frequency of oods and surveying ood-prone areas is a common hydrologists and water resources management (Papaioannou et al 2015;Rahmati and Pourghasemi 2017). Mapping ood-prone areas is also essential for organizing and coordinating emergency response measures in natural disasters based on different management scenarios (Mostafazadeh et al 2017). It is also important to carefully study the frequency and spatial distribution of ood events in urban and rural areas (Tango et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%