Volume 5: 14th Reliability, Stress Analysis, and Failure Prevention Conference; 7th Flexible Assembly Conference 2000
DOI: 10.1115/detc2000/rsafp-14478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scenario-Based FMEA: A Life Cycle Cost Perspective

Abstract: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a method to identify and prioritize potential failures of a product or process. The traditional FMEA uses three factors, Occurrence, Severity, and Detection, to determine the Risk Priority Number (RPN). This paper addresses two major problems with the conventional FMEA approach: 1) The Detection index does not accurately measure contribution to risk, and 2) The RPN is an inconsistent risk-prioritization technique. The authors recommend two deployment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FMEA is a method to identify and prioritize potential failure of a product or a process (Sutrisno et al , 2018). The traditional FMEA uses three factors, occurrence, severity and detection, to determine the risk priority number (Kmenta and Ishii, 2000). Prasad et al (2012) defined the Ishikawa/fishbone diagram as a tool used to identify and systematically list the different root causes that can be attributed to a problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMEA is a method to identify and prioritize potential failure of a product or a process (Sutrisno et al , 2018). The traditional FMEA uses three factors, occurrence, severity and detection, to determine the risk priority number (Kmenta and Ishii, 2000). Prasad et al (2012) defined the Ishikawa/fishbone diagram as a tool used to identify and systematically list the different root causes that can be attributed to a problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Life cost-based FMEA Steven Kmenta & Kosuke Ishii, [2]. Stated that risk contains two basic elements: chance and consequences.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of risk of each failure is represented by the product of these 3 ranked indices, called the Risk Priority Number (RPN). But inconsistent definitions result in questionable risk priorities, and the use of failure modes rather than cause and effect fault chains inhibits ones understanding of the true causes of failures [3]. Furthermore traditional FMEA ends with the calculation of RPNs, the team does not consider the consequences of the failures in terms of costs.…”
Section: Problems With Traditional Fmeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk contains 2 basic elements (1) chance, measured by probability, and (2) consequence, measured by cost. A new methodology has been developed to overcome these shortcomings, it is called "Life Cost-based FMEA" [3,4] It measures risk of failure in terms of cost. Cost is a universal language understood by engineers without ambiguity.…”
Section: Lifetime Cost: a Measure Of Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%