2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04138-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scenario ensemble modelling of possible future earthquake impacts in Bhutan

Abstract: Recent large earthquakes in the Himalaya have resulted in tens of thousands of fatalities, yet these events are thought to have had relatively moderate magnitudes for the region. Evidence suggests multiple events throughout the Himalaya in the last 1000 years have had M > 8.0 and at least two have had M > 8.5. Despite this, understanding of earthquake risk in the region is poorly constrained, particularly in Bhutan, where research on both past and future earthquakes is notably scarce. While recent work has cle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the default Hazus inventories do not provide enough detail for a complete analysis of this type, a municipality or state could update the building, infrastructure, and population inventories in Hazus to get more accurate estimates, especially for critical infrastructure or areas of particular interest. Another sort of hybrid PSHA/DSHA approach is to combine a suite of ground shaking and loss estimation scenarios for plausible earthquake sources with infrastructure and population vulnerability data to estimate the overall risk for an area, as Robinson (2020) and Robinson et al (2018) did for Nepal and Bhutan. Because earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States are infrequent and there is limited prehistoric and historic seismic activity, running a suite of plausible scenarios could help identify the sites of significant risk across scenarios, and special vulnerabilities associated with essential facilities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the default Hazus inventories do not provide enough detail for a complete analysis of this type, a municipality or state could update the building, infrastructure, and population inventories in Hazus to get more accurate estimates, especially for critical infrastructure or areas of particular interest. Another sort of hybrid PSHA/DSHA approach is to combine a suite of ground shaking and loss estimation scenarios for plausible earthquake sources with infrastructure and population vulnerability data to estimate the overall risk for an area, as Robinson (2020) and Robinson et al (2018) did for Nepal and Bhutan. Because earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States are infrequent and there is limited prehistoric and historic seismic activity, running a suite of plausible scenarios could help identify the sites of significant risk across scenarios, and special vulnerabilities associated with essential facilities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI)) and local stakeholders have conducted detailed scenarios that analyze both the hazards due to ground shaking and the risk associated with exposure and vulnerability for southern California near Los Angeles (the Great ShakeOut; see Jones et al, 2008; Porter et al, 2011), northern California near San Francisco (the HayWired scenario; see Detweiler and Wein, 2018), and the California–Mexico border near San Diego–Tijuana (EERI, 2020). Robinson (2020) and Robinson et al (2018) used ensembles of deterministic scenarios, along with population, infrastructure, and vulnerability inventories, to assess risk due to various possible seismic sources in Nepal and Bhutan. Deterministic scenarios have been widely used for assessing potential impacts of a NMSZ earthquake (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past studies have used a number of different methods to compute ground shaking and impact estimates for hypothetical scenario earthquakes. Robinson et al (2018) and Robinson (2020) predicted ground shaking for scenario earthquake ensembles consisting of 90 different seismic events in Nepal and Bhutan, which were then combined with building type and population data to predict potential fatality and impacts to infrastructure. The USGS ShakeMap system has also been used to create scenario earthquakes at multiple locations of interest across the United States, including a M 7.0 earthquake on the Hayward Fault to examine potential impacts from ground shaking in the San Francisco Bay area of California (Detweiler and Wein, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segment of the in eastern Bhutan is thought to host a potential slip of more than 10-12 m (Bilham, 2019;Robinson, 2020), the greatest in the Himalayas, implying high seismic hazard (Stevens et al, 2020). Conversely, the Bhutanese Himalaya experience fewer instrumental earthquakes than the central and western Himalayas (Gahalaut et al, 2011;Stevens and Avouac, 2015;Jayangondaperumal et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%