2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
72
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The time frame set for the ideal futures was 15-20 years. This is consistent with suggestions from several researchers in this area (Hojer et al, 2008;Tompkins et al, 2000;Westhoek et al, 2005).…”
Section: Stage 1: Generating Ideal Futuressupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The time frame set for the ideal futures was 15-20 years. This is consistent with suggestions from several researchers in this area (Hojer et al, 2008;Tompkins et al, 2000;Westhoek et al, 2005).…”
Section: Stage 1: Generating Ideal Futuressupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, results from an LCA can mainly be used for identification of parts and aspects of a life cycle where improvements in the environmental performance are important (Höjer et al, 2008;Graedel and Allenby, 2010).…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative nature of the data makes it difficult to look at longterm developments concerning the future, as there is no measured data for it. Höjer et al [36] argue that this is a common problem for environmental system analysis tools, and that there is a need for more prospective thinking and integrating with future studies. The real-time focus of ICT can accentuate this problem, as data becomes more immediate and there is less room for reflection than in traditional environmental system analysis tools.…”
Section: A Trusting Only On Datamentioning
confidence: 99%