Scent of the familiar: An fMRI study of canine brain responses to familiar and unfamiliar human and dog odors

Abstract

Understanding dogs' perceptual experience of both conspecifics and humans is important to understand how dogs evolved and the nature of their relationships with humans and other dogs. Olfaction is believed to be dogs' most powerful and perhaps important sense and an obvious place to begin for the study of social cognition of conspecifics and humans. We used fMRI in a cohort of dogs (N=12) that had been trained to remain motionless while unsedated and unrestrained in the MRI. By presenting scents from humans and conspecifics, we aimed to identify the dimensions of dogs' responses to salient biological odors - whether they are based on species (dog or human), familiarity, or a specific combination of factors. We focused our analysis on the dog's caudate nucleus because of its well-known association with positive expectations and because of its clearly defined anatomical location. We hypothesized that if dogs' primary association to reward, whether it is based on food or social bonds, is to humans, then the human scents would activate the caudate more than the conspecific scents. Conversely, if the smell of conspecifics activated the caudate more than the smell of humans, dogs' association to reward would be stronger to their fellow canines. Five scents were presented (self, familiar human, strange human, familiar dog, strange dog). While the olfactory bulb/peduncle was activated to a similar degree by all the scents, the caudate was activated maximally to the familiar human. Importantly, the scent of the familiar human was not the handler, meaning that the caudate response differentiated the scent in the absence of the person being present. The caudate activation suggested that not only did the dogs discriminate that scent from the others, they had a positive association with it. This speaks to the power of the dog's sense of smell, and it provides important clues about the importance of humans in dogs' lives. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Canine Behavior.

Current Trends in Canine Problem-Solving and Cognition

“…For example, an overall pattern of brain activity can be obtained by placing electrodes on specific locations of the skull; non-invasive polysomnography used to measure dog sleep physiology can provide electroencephalogram (EEG) data that are directly comparable to those of humans (Kis, Szakadát, et al, 2014); and the local activation pattern of the brain in response to stimulation can be revealed by fMRI. In this way, unrestrained, awake dogs can be used to map the response to auditory stimuli in a comparative setting (Andics et al, 2014;Andics et al, 2016), to reward signals (Berns, Brooks, & Spivak, 2013) and the signal source (Cook, Spivak, & Berns, 2014), and to scents (Berns, Brooks, & Spivak, 2015).…”

Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) Discriminate Between Familiar and Unfamiliar Human Visual and Olfactory Cues

“…demonstrated in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris: Berns, Brooks, & Spivak, 2015), human vocal cues in domestic cats (Felis catus: Saito & Shinozuka, 2013), and human faces in domestic dogs and sheep (Canis familiaris: Mongillo, Scandurra, Kramer, & Marinelli, 2017; Ovis aries: Peirce, Liegh, daCosta, & Kendrick, 2001). Audio-visual cross modal recognition of humans has been demonstrated in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus, Adachi & Fujita, 2007).…”

Veterinary neurology

“…Indeed, recent evidence from functional MRI scans (using dogs trained to lie still and wear headphones!) has found striking functional homologies between dogs and humans 3. A few differences in our patients include, of course, the much smaller forebrain, specifically the prefrontal cortex of our patients, the relatively longer spinal cord (in horses it ends at the lumbosacral junction) and the impressive insignificance of the pyramidal system: in dogs it contributes perhaps 25% of motor tracts, in horses there is ‘no’ corticospinal tract caudal to the second cervical segment 4.…”