2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.10569
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schatten classes and commutators of Riesz transform on Heisenberg group and applications

Zhijie Fan,
Michael Lacey,
Ji Li

Abstract: We establish the necessary and sufficient conditions for those symbols b on the Heisenberg group H n for which the commutator with the Riesz transform is of Schatten class. Our main result generalises classical results of Peller, Janson-Wolff and Rochberg-Semmes, which address the same question in the Euclidean setting. Moreover, the approach that we develop bypasses the use of Fourier analysis, and can be applied to characterise that the commutator is of the Schatten class in other settings beyond Euclidean.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar Janson-Wolff phenomenon has been demonstrated by Feldman and Rochberg [32] for the Cauchy-Szegő projection on the unit ball and Heisenberg group via the Hankel operators. Here we establish the analogous result of Feldman and Rochberg in our setting, based on our main result, Theorem 1.3, and on the recent breakthrough of Fan, Lacey and Li [28], since the theory of Fourier analysis and Hankel operator is not as effective as in the Euclidean setting or the classical Heisenberg group setting.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar Janson-Wolff phenomenon has been demonstrated by Feldman and Rochberg [32] for the Cauchy-Szegő projection on the unit ball and Heisenberg group via the Hankel operators. Here we establish the analogous result of Feldman and Rochberg in our setting, based on our main result, Theorem 1.3, and on the recent breakthrough of Fan, Lacey and Li [28], since the theory of Fourier analysis and Hankel operator is not as effective as in the Euclidean setting or the classical Heisenberg group setting.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Based on our fundamental results in Lemmas 6.1-6.4, (2) holds by using the argument in [28]. Hence, the proof of Theorem 1.6 is complete.…”
Section: Note Thatmentioning
confidence: 68%