2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-013-0611-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling a Bi-Objective Hybrid Flow Shop with Sequence-Dependent Family Setup Times Using Metaheuristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A metaheuristic approach based on GA is proposed to minimize the makespan and the total tardiness of jobs. Fadaei and Zandieh (2013) considered group scheduling in the HFS scheduling problem with identical parallel machines within the area of sequence-dependent family setup times and two objectives of minimizing makespan and total tardiness of jobs. They focused on three multi-objective algorithms, multi-objective GA, sub-population GA-II and non-dominated sorting GA-II (NSGA-II), to solve the mentioned prob-lem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A metaheuristic approach based on GA is proposed to minimize the makespan and the total tardiness of jobs. Fadaei and Zandieh (2013) considered group scheduling in the HFS scheduling problem with identical parallel machines within the area of sequence-dependent family setup times and two objectives of minimizing makespan and total tardiness of jobs. They focused on three multi-objective algorithms, multi-objective GA, sub-population GA-II and non-dominated sorting GA-II (NSGA-II), to solve the mentioned prob-lem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behnamian and Zandieh [18] developed a hybrid algorithm of PSO, SA and variable neighborhood search (VNS) to solve the SDST HFS scheduling with position-dependent learning effects. Fadaei and Zandieh [19] considered group scheduling in the problem of bi-objective HFS scheduling within the area of sequence-dependent family setup times. They focused on three multi-objective algorithms, multi-objective GA, sub-population GA-II and non-dominated sorting GA-II (NSGA-II), to solve the mentioned problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solving multi-objective flow shop scheduling problem has been gaining importance in recent years, in fact, many authors have developed diverse hybrid approaches and not hybrid approaches : Genetic local search [3], artificial neural network [4], particle swarm optimization [5], ant colony system [6], GRASP heuristic [7], hybrid TP+PLS [8], pareto approach [9], [10], [11], [12], multi-objective genetic algorithm and subpopulation genetic algorithm-II and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II [13], multi-objective genetic algorithm [14], quantum differential evolutionary algorithm [15], Parallel multiple reference point approach [16], glowworm swarm optimization [17], genetic algorithm [18], genetic algorithm optimization technique [19], memetic algorithm [20], hybrid non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm with variable local search [21], hybrid harmony search [22], Heuristic algorithms [23], lower-bound-based GA [24]. [25] summarizes some contributions to solve flow shop scheduling problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%