2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2005.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling a hybrid flowshop with batch production at the last stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heuristics for the HFS with m-stages, uniform parallel machines and makespan criterion are due to [176] and [107]. [223] study the case where the last of m stages is a batching stage. The results over a large set of small instances indicated that the proposed heuristic obtains close to optimal solutions for very small problem instances.…”
Section: Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heuristics for the HFS with m-stages, uniform parallel machines and makespan criterion are due to [176] and [107]. [223] study the case where the last of m stages is a batching stage. The results over a large set of small instances indicated that the proposed heuristic obtains close to optimal solutions for very small problem instances.…”
Section: Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Shifting Bottleneck (SB) heuristic for the jobshop problem can be adapted to solve the FFS problem (Pinedo 1994). Other configurations of the FFS with various sets of constraints or objective functions have also been studied: availability constraints (Allaoui and Artiba 2006), flow time minimization or total completion time (Azizoglu et al 2001;Guinet and Solomon 1996), job recirculation (Bertel and Billaut 2004), precedence constraints (Botta-Genoulaz 2000; Tang et al 2006), state-dependent processing times (Sriskandarajah and Wagneur 1991), limited intermediate storage (Sawik 2002), pre-emption in job processing (Djellab and Djellab 2002), or even batch processing of jobs (Xuan and Tang 2007). Integrated planning and scheduling approach for shops with multiple processors in parallel has also been proposed (Riane et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of such studies deal with problems in which ready times of jobs are not considered, that is, ready times of the jobs are 0. Among these, Arthanary and Ramaswamy (1971), Mittal and Nagga (1973), Narasimhan and Panwalkar (1984), Gupta (1988), Sriskandarajah and Sethi (1989), Gupta andTunc (1991, 1994), Rajendran and Chaudhuri (1992), Lee and Vairaktarakis (1994), Chen (1995), Hoogeveen et al (1996), Guinet and Solomon (1996), Gupta et al (1997), Oguz et al (1997), Lee and Park (1999), Soewandi and Elmaghraby (2003), Cheng et al (2004), , and Zhang et al (2005) focus on the hybrid flowshop problems with two stages, while Paul (1979), Kochhar and Morris (1987), Wittrock (1988), Brah and Hunsucker (1991), Riane et al (1998), Serifoglu and Ulusoy (2004), Choi et al (2005), Jin et al (2006), Lee (2006), Ruiz and Maroto (2006), Tang et al (2006), Ying and Lin (2006), Janiak et al (2007), Quadt and Kuhn (2007), Vosz and Witt (2007), and Xuan and Tang (2007) focus on those with more than two stages. On the other hand, suggest a bottleneck-focused scheduling algorithm for a multi-stage hybrid flowshop scheduling problem, in which scheduling at the bottleneck workstation is done using estimated job ready times.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%