2009
DOI: 10.1080/00207540701824845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling job shop associated with multiple routings with genetic and ant colony heuristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 4 we compare our results on the BRData set with these obtained by Ho et al (2007) using CDR-PopGen and LEGA; and these obtained by Girish and Jawahar (2008) who solved them using Ant Colony Optimization (JSSANT) and Genetic algorithms (JSSGA). Table 4 shows that the proposed hGA either outperforms other algorithms or obtain the same minimum makespan in all cases.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Table 4 we compare our results on the BRData set with these obtained by Ho et al (2007) using CDR-PopGen and LEGA; and these obtained by Girish and Jawahar (2008) who solved them using Ant Colony Optimization (JSSANT) and Genetic algorithms (JSSGA). Table 4 shows that the proposed hGA either outperforms other algorithms or obtain the same minimum makespan in all cases.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Zribi et al (2007) used a hierarchical GA approach to solve the machine assignment and scheduling of FJSP. Girish and Jawahar (2008) proposed two concurrent metaheuristic approaches, genetic algorithm (JSSGA) and ant colony (JSSANT) to solve job shops with multiple routings. Xu et al (2009), Xing et al (2010 and Ling et al (2010) presented an ant colony optimization algorithm for the FJSP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From then on, the ACO algorithm received increasing attention and enjoyed great success in solving combinatorial optimisation problems. For instance, telecommunication routing (Schoonderwoerd et al 1997), product level MMAL balancing problem (McMullen 2001b), quadratic assignment problem (Shyu et al 2006), vehicle routing problem (Gagne et al 2006), industry layout problem (Hani et al 2007), dynamic manufacturing scheduling problem (Wang and Lee 2008), DNA sequencing problem (Blum et al 2008), multidimensional Knapsack problem (Kong et al 2008), flow shop scheduling problem (Yagmahan and Yenisey 2008), assembly line workload balancing problem (Vilarinho andSimaria 2006, Sabuncuoglu et al 2009), project management problem (Abdallah et al 2009), distributed supply chain management problem (Silva et al 2009), multiprocessor task scheduling problem (Ying and lin 2006), line balancing and sequencing problem (Agrawal and Tiwari 2008), agile manufacturing system scheduling problem , dynamic job shop scheduling problems (Zhou et al 2009), job shop scheduling problem (Chang et al 2008, Huang and Liao 2008, Girish and Jawahar 2009, and others. It has been proved that the ACO based algorithms might get solutions with better quality than simple heuristics (McMullen 2001b), which is important for practical applications.…”
Section: Aco Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tay and Ho [14] proposed a genetic programming-based approach for evolving effective composite dispatching rules to solve the multi-objective FJSP. Girish and Jawahar [15] proposed a GA for the FJSP for minimum makespan time criterion. Ponnambalam et al [16] employed a genetic algorithm (GA)-based heuristics that have adopted the Giffler and Thompson (GT) procedure, an efficient and active feasible schedule for makespan time criterion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%