2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11265-006-0004-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling of Iterative Algorithms with Matrix Operations for Efficient FPGA Design—Implementation of Finite Interval Constant Modulus Algorithm

Abstract: This paper deals with the optimization of iterative algorithms with matrix operations or nested loops for hardware implementation in Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA), using Integer Linear Programming (ILP). The method is demonstrated on an implementation of the Finite Interval Constant Modulus Algorithm. It is an equalization algorithm, suitable for modern communication systems (4G and behind). For the floatingpoint calculations required in the algorithm, two arithmetic libraries were used in the FPGA imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time complexity of the presented ILP models can be further optimized by the elimination of the redundant processor constraints method [23], a polynomial algorithm reducing the size of the ILP model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The time complexity of the presented ILP models can be further optimized by the elimination of the redundant processor constraints method [23], a polynomial algorithm reducing the size of the ILP model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the simplest objectives is to minimize the iteration overlap by the objective function (4) as is assumed in this paper. Another criterion that can be directly used in this ILP model, can be used to minimize the iteration length or to minimize the number of storage units for the data transfer among the tasks [23].…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation