2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2016.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling of unit-length jobs with cubic incompatibility graphs on three uniform machines

Abstract: In the paper we consider the problem of scheduling n identical jobs on 3 uniform machines with speeds s 1 , s 2 , and s 3 to minimize the schedule length. We assume that jobs are subjected to some kind of mutual exclusion constraints, modeled by a cubic incompatibility graph. We show that if the graph is 2-chromatic then the problem can be solved in O(n 2 ) time. If the graph is 3-chromatic, the problem becomes NP-hard even if s 1 > s 2 = s 3 . However, in this case there exists a 4/3-approximation algorithm r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to the best of our knowledge little work has been done on scheduling problems with uniform machines involved (cf. [6,7]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge little work has been done on scheduling problems with uniform machines involved (cf. [6,7]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, such a color class V 1 will be called non-equitable. These two models of graph coloring are motivated by applications in multiprocessor scheduling of unit-execution time jobs [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furmańczyk [4] mentions a specific application of this type of scheduling problem, namely, assigning university courses to time slots in a way that avoids scheduling incompatible courses at the same time and spreads the courses evenly among the available time slots. Also, the application of equitable coloring in scheduling of jobs on uniform machines was considered in [7] and [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%