2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling optimization of yard cranes with minimal energy consumption at container terminals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted at this point, that naturally any process undertaken for optimizing a single or a set of port operations, also induces energy gains, among other benefits that are realized to this end (i.e., time and cost savings), These usually account for the main objective of most optimization efforts. Although the scientific literature on port optimization is vast, with more recent approaches also integrating energy considerations into their methods [27][28][29][30], the level to which those have been applied in real operational environments, and even more the extent to which energy aspects are being taken into consideration by the operational planning teams of port authorities and/or terminal operators, is not very easy to determine. Relevant information does not usually become publicly available, nor is it promoted through any other means (e.g., shared through relevant presentations in events targeting port sustainability).…”
Section: Key Operational Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted at this point, that naturally any process undertaken for optimizing a single or a set of port operations, also induces energy gains, among other benefits that are realized to this end (i.e., time and cost savings), These usually account for the main objective of most optimization efforts. Although the scientific literature on port optimization is vast, with more recent approaches also integrating energy considerations into their methods [27][28][29][30], the level to which those have been applied in real operational environments, and even more the extent to which energy aspects are being taken into consideration by the operational planning teams of port authorities and/or terminal operators, is not very easy to determine. Relevant information does not usually become publicly available, nor is it promoted through any other means (e.g., shared through relevant presentations in events targeting port sustainability).…”
Section: Key Operational Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formula (12) ensures that the relationship between the number of tasks actually completed and the number of task overflows in any block during the planned period.…”
Section: Constraint Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S.önke Behrends [11] examines the relationship between urban transport and road-rail intermodal transport with the goal of identifying possible actions on a local level to improve both the competitiveness and environmental benefits of rail freight. Sha M et al [12] propose a novel integer programming model to solve optimal problem of yard crane scheduling with minimal energy consumption at container terminals from the low carbon perspective. Bierwirth C and Meisel F's [13] particular focus is put on integrated solution approaches; they developed a new classification schemes for berth allocation problems and quay crane scheduling problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While M. S. Omar et al study on scheduling algorithm in order to find best performance in term of settling time and percentage of overshoot [9]. Another method scheduling optimization of RTGC by considering on moving distance, turning distance and practical operation rule [10]. This paper will study the nonlinear dynamic model equation of the system 3D overhead gantry crane system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%