2006
DOI: 10.1155/2006/271608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling Scientific Workflow Applications with Deadline and Budget Constraints Using Genetic Algorithms

Abstract: Grid technologies have progressed towards a service-oriented paradigm that enables a new way of service provisioning based on utility computing models, which are capable of supporting diverse computing services. It facilitates scientific applications to take advantage of computing resources distributed world wide to enhance the capability and performance. Many scientific applications in areas such as bioinformatics and astronomy require workflow processing in which tasks are executed based on their control or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
212
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
212
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a guarantee of service is hard to provide in a Grid environment due to its shared, heterogeneous and distributed resources owned by different organizations with their own policies and pricing mechanisms [4]. Many algorithms for deadline and budget constrained scheduling have been proposed [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In [25], Sakellariou et al proposed two different approaches, namely the LOSS approach and the GAIN approach to find the schedule for a given DAGstructured workflow and a given set of resources without exceeding the budget and is still optimized for overall execution time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a guarantee of service is hard to provide in a Grid environment due to its shared, heterogeneous and distributed resources owned by different organizations with their own policies and pricing mechanisms [4]. Many algorithms for deadline and budget constrained scheduling have been proposed [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In [25], Sakellariou et al proposed two different approaches, namely the LOSS approach and the GAIN approach to find the schedule for a given DAGstructured workflow and a given set of resources without exceeding the budget and is still optimized for overall execution time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various resource protocols in grid and cloud systems [13,26,32] and workflow orchestration algorithms are being investigated for specific applications [16,25,31]. However, the resource abstraction and associated QoS model in WORDS provides a uniform knowledge of resource properties that was previously not available to higher-level tools.…”
Section: Workflow Orchestrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various DAG scheduling algorithms have been proposed for grid environments for optimizing makespan, meeting deadline and/or budget constraints or dealing with uncertainty [16,25,31]. The underlying assumption of all these algorithms is that resources are guaranteed to be available at a given time, whereas resource availability is highly variable.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a number of cost-aware workflow scheduling heuristics [9] [10] have been proposed and evaluated. Even though multiple criteria have been considered, their aim was to optimize a single objective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%