2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-0190(01)00251-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling with job release dates, delivery times and preemption penalties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scaling technique has been already successfully applied to design a fully polynomial approximation schedule for 0-1 Knapsack problem (see [21]). There are recent applications of this scaling technique for some scheduling problems (for example, [22,23]). In this paper, we formulate a scaled problem for TBS and prove that any efficient algorithm for the scaled problem is a 1+e-approximation algorithm for the original problem TBS.…”
Section: An Fptasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scaling technique has been already successfully applied to design a fully polynomial approximation schedule for 0-1 Knapsack problem (see [21]). There are recent applications of this scaling technique for some scheduling problems (for example, [22,23]). In this paper, we formulate a scaled problem for TBS and prove that any efficient algorithm for the scaled problem is a 1+e-approximation algorithm for the original problem TBS.…”
Section: An Fptasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are modeled as set-up costs or as a preemption model where after preemption a portion of the job must be re-executed; see e.g. [5,6,3].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monma and Potts [2] and Chen [3] suggested the heuristics for parallel machine scheduling problem subject to preemption and batch setup times. Zdrzalka [4], Schuurman and Woeginger [5], and Liu and Cheng [6] studied preemptive scheduling with job release dates and job-dependent setup times. Julien et al [7] proposed generalized preemption models for single-machine dynamic scheduling problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%