Neo-Institutionalismus - Revisited 2017
DOI: 10.5771/9783845273785-415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

„Scheinheiligkeit“ von Organisationen: Paradoxien und Tabus. Das Beispiel der Vereinbarkeitsmaßnahmen und ihrer Nutzung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, 60% of the fathers who do take parental leave, limit their leave to 2 months (BMFSFJ, 2018). Indeed, researchers argue that many organizations offer family‐friendly measures to fathers more as a symbolic concession than a genuine acknowledgment of fathers' legitimate care needs, as expectations about job performance remain unchanged (Alemann, 2017⁠; Lott & Klenner, 2016). As official organizational family‐friendliness policies have limited impact on the day‐to‐day reality of working fathers, other ways to change organization cultures are needed, and this is where the organizational promoters of father‐friendliness come into play.…”
Section: Context: Germany and The Organizational Promoters Of Father‐...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also, 60% of the fathers who do take parental leave, limit their leave to 2 months (BMFSFJ, 2018). Indeed, researchers argue that many organizations offer family‐friendly measures to fathers more as a symbolic concession than a genuine acknowledgment of fathers' legitimate care needs, as expectations about job performance remain unchanged (Alemann, 2017⁠; Lott & Klenner, 2016). As official organizational family‐friendliness policies have limited impact on the day‐to‐day reality of working fathers, other ways to change organization cultures are needed, and this is where the organizational promoters of father‐friendliness come into play.…”
Section: Context: Germany and The Organizational Promoters Of Father‐...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We regard this to be consistent with one of the dynamics of postfeminism in organizations (Adamson & Kelan, 2019; Gill, Kelan et al., 2017⁠; Lewis et al., 2017⁠; Lewis, Simpson et al., 2018⁠): if gender inequality is acknowledged, it is addressed as an individual problem of choices and a lack of empowerment rather than changing structures. In a postfeminist culture, equality becomes a topic that carries prestige and symbolic capital, with companies competing for awards and certificates for gender equality (Kelan, 2018a) and family‐friendliness (Alemann, 2017) as to appear as good employers. However, framing family‐friendly policies as available for mothers and fathers seems to be more a rhetoric attempt to gender equality than evidence of structural changes (Smithson & Stokoe, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Der Widerspruch zwischen verborgenen Regeln und offiziellen Statements der Organisation lässt sich mit Hilfe des soziologischen Neoinstitutionalismus erklären (Alemann 2017). Dieser Ansatz geht davon aus, dass Organisationen in ein gesellschaftliches Umfeld eingebettet sind, in dem sie ihre Existenz legitimieren müssen (Scott 1995).…”
Section: Theoretischer Hintergrund: Verborgene Regeln Als Bestandteilunclassified