2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30284-8_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SCHEMA - An Algorithm for Automated Product Taxonomy Mapping in E-commerce

Abstract: Abstract. This paper proposes SCHEMA, an algorithm for automated mapping between heterogeneous product taxonomies in the e-commerce domain. SCHEMA utilises word sense disambiguation techniques, based on the ideas from the algorithm proposed by Lesk, in combination with the semantic lexicon WordNet. For finding candidate map categories and determining the path-similarity we propose a node matching function that is based on the Levenshtein distance. The final mapping quality score is calculated using the Damerau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, in the following, we will use the terms ontology and taxonomy with the same meaning.”)the paper contains an evaluation of their alignment process by comparing to other “ontology” matchers. For instance, we exclude Aanen et al .’s (2012) paper: though the authors used the term “taxonomy mapping” throughout their paper, they compared their matcher SCHEMA with other ontology matchers by Noy and Musen (2003) and Park and Kim (2007).the paper conducts an evaluation of their alignment process by using benchmark “ontology” alignment datasets. For example, we exclude the study by Lin et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, in the following, we will use the terms ontology and taxonomy with the same meaning.”)the paper contains an evaluation of their alignment process by comparing to other “ontology” matchers. For instance, we exclude Aanen et al .’s (2012) paper: though the authors used the term “taxonomy mapping” throughout their paper, they compared their matcher SCHEMA with other ontology matchers by Noy and Musen (2003) and Park and Kim (2007).the paper conducts an evaluation of their alignment process by using benchmark “ontology” alignment datasets. For example, we exclude the study by Lin et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spanning across different fields, taxonomy alignment (mapping, matching, merging) work flourishes in biodiversity (Franz et al. , 2016), biology (Kanehisa et al ., 2022), e-commerce (Aanen et al ., 2012), information systems and computer science (Raunich and Rahm, 2014) and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point it is necessary to define the taxonomy model and to locate the concepts without ancestors, in order to begin to visit all the concepts. This is particular relevant in forest models 1 . Note that the ArrayList is necessary to store the visited concepts.…”
Section: Calling To the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of aligning taxonomies have received much attention by the research community since various knowledge based applications, including clustering algorithms, browsing support interfaces, and recommendation systems, perform more effectively when they are supported with domain describing taxonomies, which help to resolve ambiguities and provide context [3]. Furthermore, this problem is of great interest on a number of application areas, especially in scientific [6], business [1] [14], and web data integration [4] [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not focus on the required preprocessing steps, such as HTML table extraction [4] and product duplicate detection [1,6]. Instead, the presence of product information on the collected Web pages in the form of key-value pairs is assumed.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%