1989
DOI: 10.1086/209192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

39
734
4
30

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,047 publications
(807 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
39
734
4
30
Order By: Relevance
“…We expected that the extent to which participants saw the product as human would mediate their liking of the product. The results are consistent with prior research on schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation (Meyers-Levy and Tybout 1989).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We expected that the extent to which participants saw the product as human would mediate their liking of the product. The results are consistent with prior research on schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation (Meyers-Levy and Tybout 1989).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…More generally, a schema is a stored framework of cognitive knowledge that represents information about a topic, a concept, or a particular stimulus, including its attributes and the relations among the attributes (Fiske and Linville 1980). Past research suggests that evaluations of a new product may depend on the level of congruity between that product's features and the category schema in which it is presented, whereas the level of congruity is the extent to which features of the product match those of the category schema (Fiske 1982;Meyers-Levy and Tybout 1989). The influence of congruity has been attributed to the transfer of affect from the schema to the object (Fiske 1982) and to metacognitive experiences of satisfaction or frustration in perceiving the fit between the object and the schema that carry over to the evaluation of the object (Meyers-Levy and Tybout 1989).…”
Section: Schema Congruity As a Basis For Product Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars support the notion that congruence may enhance the perceived brand or product value (Erdem & Swait, 1998. In contrast, a body of work supports the moderate incongruity effect, which implies that consumers view moderately incongruent products more favorably than those that are congruent or extremely incongruent (Meyers-Levy & Tybout, 1989;Peracchio & Tybout, 1996;Stayman, Alden, & Smith, 1992). For example, Fleck and Quester (2007) found in their study of congruency for sponsorship that a certain level of mismatch between the sponsor and the event contributes to an unexpectedness or surprise that enhances positive evaluations.…”
Section: Congruence Versus Incongruence For Product Design and Colormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumers usually place products into mental categories and make use of this organized prior knowledge to evaluate them (Meyers-Levy and Tybout, 1989). Johansson (1989) states that when production technology is non-standardized, there should be some differences in country manufacturing skills and thus, COO effects should be more pronounced.…”
Section: Country-of-origin Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%