2012
DOI: 10.3726/978-3-653-01718-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schiller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this analysis, conventional single-SNP GWAS (ssGWAS) are complemented with a computational biostatistics approach (muGWAS, GWAS using muStat (Wittkowski 2012) ) that incorporates knowledge about genetics into the method (Wittkowski 2010, Sections 4.3.4 and 4.4.2;Wittkowski 2013) and knowledge about the nature of GWAS into the decision strategy. (Wittkowski 2014) Statistical methods tend to have higher power if they are based on more realistic assumptions, which, in biology, tend to be weak.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, conventional single-SNP GWAS (ssGWAS) are complemented with a computational biostatistics approach (muGWAS, GWAS using muStat (Wittkowski 2012) ) that incorporates knowledge about genetics into the method (Wittkowski 2010, Sections 4.3.4 and 4.4.2;Wittkowski 2013) and knowledge about the nature of GWAS into the decision strategy. (Wittkowski 2014) Statistical methods tend to have higher power if they are based on more realistic assumptions, which, in biology, tend to be weak.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%