“…In general, actuarial prediction schemes contain primarily static variables (such as age, gender, history of offenses, and so on), which are historically based and likely will not change over time. Although some studies show that clinical variables (i.e., variables related to clinical status that are dynamic and expected to change over time) may be predictive of future violence (Sepejak, Menzies, Webster, & Jensen, 1983), most researchers maintain that actuarial prediction based on static factors invariably outperforms clinical prediction when attempting to predict future violence (e.g., Bonta, Law, & Hanson, 1998;Cirincione, Steadman, Robbins, & Monahan, 1992;Dawes et al, 1989;Klassen & O'Connor, 1988Steadman, 1980). However, the focus on static, historical variables has somewhat limited the clinical application of risk assessment technology, because the primary goal is prediction rather than treatment, monitoring of change, or developing clinical interventions to actively manage risk.…”