Given our basic recognition of the extensively variable human condition, traditional models of risk factors in disease and development appear contrastingly restrictive when it comes to some of the identified relationships between exposures and outcomes. Using schizophrenia as a model, Szoke et al. [1] introduce in this issue a novel paradigm that designates non-specific environmental and genetic elements as variability-enhancing factors, facilitating an indiscriminate predisposition to both favorable and adverse individual results. Subsequent questions arise on validating this model and the appropriate resolution of an exposure in future investigations. In exposing a population to early childhood stress for instance, it can be expected that some will develop a propensity for schizophrenia. Under the same exposure, others will develop cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, diabetes, or cancer, amongst a range of psychiatric and organic illnesses. [2] Some will be entirely unaffected, and perhaps crucially, many will instead adapt and thrive from the adversity. These observations initially come across as instinctive in our understanding of stress: people react differently to it. However, under the prevailing risk factor paradigm of complex disorders, this exposure along with others cannot be easily reconciled as traditional risk factors. They are poorly specific, inadequate in explaining the multiple co-morbidities, and persistent in the case of genetic factors despite an undesirable phenotype. Adjusting for these limitations is not straightforward, necessitating the introduction of resilience factors or the requirement of a cumulative multifactorial effect. Beyond this, there is little in the way of prevention other than generalized avoidance strategies, which can inadvertently eliminate desirable effects. As a consequence of the paradigm in schizophrenia, for example, stress and similar "risk factors" such as urbanicity, migration, and language variation, are automatically attributed to detrimental models of defeat, discrimination, and disempowerment, despite the benefits that they may bring to individuals. [3] Szoke et al. [1] propose a paradigm in which some of the factors in schizophrenia and other developmental pathologies are better