2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-009-0041-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schmidt’s game on fractals

Abstract: We construct (α, β) and α-winning sets in the sense of Schmidt's game, played on the support of certain measures (absolutely friendly) and show how to compute the Hausdorff dimension for some.In particular, we prove that if K is the attractor of an irreducible finite family of contracting similarity maps of R N satisfying the open set condition, (the Cantor's ternary set, Koch's curve and Sierpinski's gasket to name a few known examples), then for any countable collection of nonsingular affine transformations,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact demonstrates that this approximation function cannot be improved for almost all irrationals. We remark that the subject of approximating points on fractals by rationals has been extensively studied in recent years; see for example [3,7,8] for badly approximable numbers and [6,14] for very well approximable numbers. In [2], elements of the Cantor set with any prescribed irrationality exponent were explicitly constructed.…”
Section: Corollary For Every Irrational X ∈ Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact demonstrates that this approximation function cannot be improved for almost all irrationals. We remark that the subject of approximating points on fractals by rationals has been extensively studied in recent years; see for example [3,7,8] for badly approximable numbers and [6,14] for very well approximable numbers. In [2], elements of the Cantor set with any prescribed irrationality exponent were explicitly constructed.…”
Section: Corollary For Every Irrational X ∈ Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C is an absolute constant. It was proven in [7] that if J ⊆ R is any Ahlfors regular set, then the union BA 1 def = ε>0 BA 1 (ε) has full dimension in J. We can prove the following quantitative version of this result: 5 We estimated the dimension of F 2 ∩C by searching for a disjoint cover of F 2 by intervals of the form Iω = [[0; ω, 1], [0; ω, 3]] or Iω = [[0; ω, 3], [0; ω, 1]] (see (6.7) for the notation), where ω is a finite word in the alphabet {1, 2}, such that either…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(This follows from the corresponding property for classical winning sets, see e.g. [7,Theorem 3.1].) The following lemma is a quantitative version of this property: Lemma 3.7.…”
Section: The Absolute Game and Its Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Namely, a result of Mayeda and Merrill states that the set Bady is winning for a different game introduced by McMullen and known as the ‘absolute game’, while the results of Broderick, Fishman, Kleinbock, Reich, and Weiss state that any set winning for the absolute game can be intersected with any sufficiently nice fractal (and in particular any Ahlfors δ‐regular fractal) to get a set winning for Schmidt's game (played on that fractal). This immediately implies that KboldBady is winning for Schmidt's game (played on K) and according to a theorem of Fishman this implies the existence of the family of sets {Fs:s<δ} described above, and in particular that dim(KboldBady)δ. To make this paper more self‐contained, in what follows we give the details behind this argument, as well as recalling the definition of Schmidt's game and the absolute game.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 94%