2005
DOI: 10.1007/11494645_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schnorr Dimension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we give the proof of the next theorem, a Schnorr version of Theorem 9. The following theorem generalizes a characterization of Schnorr dimension by Downey et al [17] (see also Downey and Hirschfeldt [13,Sect. 13.15]).…”
Section: Tot Anticomplex (Schnorr Trivial)supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Instead, we give the proof of the next theorem, a Schnorr version of Theorem 9. The following theorem generalizes a characterization of Schnorr dimension by Downey et al [17] (see also Downey and Hirschfeldt [13,Sect. 13.15]).…”
Section: Tot Anticomplex (Schnorr Trivial)supporting
confidence: 58%
“…A characterization of computable dimension in terms of computable machines has been obtained by Downey et al [1], and we conclude this section by a similar characterization in terms of decidable machines. In the context of time-bounded complexity, an equivalent formulation of the latter characterization has been previously demonstrated by Hitchcock [5], see Proposition 20.…”
Section: Proposition 14 (Downey and Griffiths)supporting
confidence: 64%
“…We give identical or very similar charaterizations of all three notions of randomness in terms of decidable machines; to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that all three notions are characterized using a single type of Turing machine. Similary, we argue that the characterization of computable Hausdorff dimension in terms of computable machines due to Downey et al [1] extends to decidable machines. In Section 4, all the mentioned charaterizations are transferred to standard time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity by arguing that the latter is closely related to Kolmogorov complexity defined via decidable machines.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Again it is possible to examine these concepts for stronger and weaker randomness notions such as Schnorr dimension. For instance, Downey, Merkle and Reimann [30] have shown that it is possible to have computably enumerable sets with nonzero Schnorr packing dimension, whereas their Schnorr Hausdorff dimension is 0. Much work remains to be done here with a plethora of open questions.…”
Section: Theorem 337 (Nies Stephan Terwijn [78]) Suppose That a Imentioning
confidence: 99%