Scholarly Activity Training During Residency: A Progress Report

Abramson, Erika L.; Naifeh, Monique; Stevenson, Michelle D.; Clifton, Shari; Li, Su-Ting Terry

doi:10.1016/j.acap.2019.12.008

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While initiatives to promote GME research face challenges, including scarce funding, time constraints, and limited experience [10,11], communities of individuals devoted to GME research in other specialties have successfully overcome these issues to produce high-quality research [12,13]. The potential benefits of an orthopedic collaborative match the recommendations described by Hogan et al [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Benefits of an Orthopedic Education Research Collaborative: An Innovative Approach

Levitt¹,

Paul²,

Vatsia³

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundGraduate Medical Education (GME) research in orthopedic surgery is an important but underrepresented subject in the medical literature. It was unknown if orthopedic residency leaders were interested in a surgical education research collaborative (orthopedic collaborative). The objectives of this study were to assess the potential benefit of an orthopedic collaborative from orthopedic residency leaders and investigate the factors associated with the support of a research collaborative within a surgical subspecialty. MethodologyAn anonymous 19-question survey-based study was distributed through REDCap (Nashville, TN, USA) to orthopedic residency leaders in the United States, from July to October 2020. The main outcome was perceived benefit. Additional aspects included program characteristics, challenges in performing resident education research, and organizational issues such as authorship, frequency of study requests, and governance. ResultsAlmost all orthopedic faculty leadership (99%, 73/74) stated that resident education and faculty development research projects would benefit from an orthopedic education research collaborative. In comparison to unsupportive respondents, younger age (P = 0.006), 15 or fewer years in practice (P = 0.04), and having 0 to 100 peer-reviewed publications (P = 0.047) were associated with support for an orthopedic collaborative. ConclusionsChallenges related to survey-based study quality and generalizability at single institutions can benefit from multi-institutional collaboration to develop high-quality studies that capture a representative sample to support orthopedic surgery program development.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Benefits of an Orthopedic Education Research Collaborative: An Innovative Approach

Levitt¹,

Paul²,

Vatsia³

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A review of existing literature demonstrates that there are no published guidelines addressing scholarly activity concerns or curricula in sports medicine. However, this is not unique to sports medicine fellowship (2)(3)(4)(5). The purpose of this project is to outline a scholarly activity curriculum for primary care sports medicine fellowships that can be implemented by any program, with the goal of promoting highquality scholarly activity and elevating the field of sports medicine as an academic discipline.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Family medicine residents must complete one piece of scholarly activity in a 3-year period, whereas fellows must complete one work of scholarly activity by the end of fellowshipa 1-year time span for the majority of programs (8). Traditional barriers to scholarly activity, including a lack of consistent faculty mentorship of the fellow, scholarship infrastructure, time constraints, and resources, are consistent challenges to meeting these requirements (2)(3)(4)9).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nearly 7% of citations by the Residency Review Committee (RRC) across specialties were issued as a result of failing to meet scholarly activity requirements (10). This may occur for several reasons, including: lack of faculty projects and mentorship, limited resources, unclear requirements, and minimal time for scholarly activity endeavors given the demands of an already busy residency/fellowship (2)(3)(4)(5).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Recommended Sports Medicine Fellowship Scholarly Activity Curriculum

Rao¹,

Khodaee²,

Asif³

2022

Curr Sports Med Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scholarly activity requirements for primary care sports medicine fellowship programs are increasing and the current Accreditation Council for Graduate Medicine Education (ACGME) expectations for fellows and core faculty are more demanding than those found in medicine residencies. A review of existing literature fails to identify any published guidelines on how to pursue scholarly activity within the sports medicine fellowship year. Such a deficiency may be critical for fellowship programs that are struggling to produce scholarship with a 1-year timeframe. This document intends to be a resource for all sports medicine fellowship programs by defining acceptable pieces of scholarly activity, delineating how a project may be completed during fellowship, and outlining avenues to educate others in the topic of choice. Adoption of this curriculum will guide fellows to meet ACGME-mandated scholarship requirements while assisting core faculty in meeting academic promotion criteria.

show abstract

Scholarly Activity Training During Residency: A Progress Report

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

Benefits of an Orthopedic Education Research Collaborative: An Innovative Approach

Benefits of an Orthopedic Education Research Collaborative: An Innovative Approach

Recommended Sports Medicine Fellowship Scholarly Activity Curriculum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About