Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media

Abstract

PurposeThe focus of this paper is to study the influence of social media on scholarly communication. The aim is to provide an overview of researchers' use of Web 2.0 techniques, and discuss a possible change of information behaviors in the context of scholarly communication.Design/methodology/approachA web survey was distributed to a targeted sample of university staff (professors, teachers, researchers, and doctoral students). SPSS was utilized as a main tool to synthesize and analyze data, and present the results.FindingsWeb 2.0 tools are well‐known to researchers. Most researchers are familiar with blogs, wikis, social networks, multimedia sharing, and online document. Social media provide a convenient environment for scholarly communication. Depending on different aims within the scholarly communication process, researchers choose appropriate modes of communication in their research work.Research limitations/implicationsA combination of content analysis with survey and/or interviews may highlight other aspects of Web 2.0, which is not possible using a single method of content analysis.Originality/valueThere are few studies on the changes of scholarly communication in the context of Web 2.0. This study provides new insights for exploring the effects of Web 2.0 tools on scholarly communication and the development of new information behavior to match the scholarly environment of social media. This understanding can aid the researchers to keep abreast of new characteristics of scholarly communication and help the librarians to develop the correlative services in the scholarly environment of social media.

Uncovering the scholarly use of Twitter in the academia: Experiences in a British University

“…Most fundamentally, Lupton (2014) has argued that these technologies also seem to have the potential to refashion scholarly communication by creating new forms of connection and new conversations. This was also observed by Gu and Widen-Wulff (2010) in their study of Finnish university staff's scholarly communication and how it is influenced by social media.…”

Use of social networks for academic purposes: a case study

“…The unifying term "Web 2.0" is closely related to the concept of social media. This term refers to technologies characterized as being user-centred, open, participatory, interactive and knowledge sharing (Gu and Widén-Wulff, 2011).…”

“…Consistent with Rowlands' results, they found that about one-third of researchers use social networks, falling short of wikis and blogs. Gu and Widén-Wulff (2011) also explored whether social media affect scholarly communication processes through a survey sent to researchers and employees at a Finnish university. Their results show that although most academics know about social networks, they use them much more in everyday life than in their research or teaching work.…”

Research Trends on Natural Hazards, Disasters, Risk Reduction and Climate Change in Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review

“…There are 177 publications in this category (SCOPUS, 2016b). The topic that receive most attention in this category is related to the governance of DRR nationally (Bakkour et al, 2015;Chang Seng, 2013;Djalante et al, 2013;Guarnacci, 2012;Lassa, 2013). The next topic that receives greater attention is on the evaluation of recover and reconstruction that have taken place after the 2004 Indian Ocean 235 tsunami which hit Aceh, located in the Island of Sumatera (Chang et al, 2011;Daly and Brassard, 2011;Godavitarne et al, 2006;Guarnacci, 2012;Karan and Subbiah, 2011;Telford and Cosgrave, 2007).…”