School board decision-making and the elimination of sport participation fees

Heinze, Kathryn L.; Zdroik, Jennifer

doi:10.1080/13573322.2016.1139562

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The included research articles were classified into five mutually exclusive primary focus areas during the data extraction phase: (1) access to and participation in sports , (2) access to SEM care , (3) health-related outcomes in SEM , (4) study methodology and (5) provider representation in SEM (table 1, online supplemental table S4). Most included studies were related to access to and participation in sports (n=45, 44%),17–61 followed by access to SEM care (n=28, 27%),62–89 health-related outcomes in SEM (n=24, 23%),90–113 provider representation in SEM (n=5, 5%)114–118 and methodology (n=1, 1%) 119…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Numerous gaps were noted when identifying potential causes of health disparities studied within each focus area specifically. Although SES (n=15 articles),22 24 29–31 34–37 40 44 47–49 race/ethnicity (n=12),19–21 25 32 35 40 47 49 52 55 57 sex (n=11)21 23 26 27 32 34–36 38 58 60 and physical ability (n=10)17 18 20 28 39 43 50 51 53 56 were well represented within the access to and participation in sports domain, certain topic areas, such as body composition (n=3),25 38 47 educational level (n=3)24 49 52 and sexual orientation (n=2),23 45were under-represented in the literature captured (figure 3A). Moreover, other potential causes of disparities such as location (urban, suburban and rural), insurance status, primary language and gender identity retrieved zero articles within this domain.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most included studies used a cross-sectional study design (n=74), which was inclusive of retrospective cohort studies (table 2, online supplemental table S5). 18 studies included qualitative methodology,21 31 33 35 39 43 46 53 54 56 61 69 75 87 94 95 117 118 with 3 using mixed methods 33 69 94. Nine studies were prospective cohort studies,27 28 60 68 77 89 90 107 119 and only two studies used a community-based participatory research framework 42 55.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Focus areas and methodological characteristics of North American-based health disparity research in sports medicine: a scoping review

Kliethermes,

Asif,

Blauwet

et al. 2024

Br J Sports Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveHealth disparities are widely prevalent; however, little has been done to examine and address their causes and effects in sports and exercise medicine (SEM). We aimed to summarise the focus areas and methodology used for existing North American health disparity research in SEM and to identify gaps in the evidence base.DesignScoping review.Data sourcesSystematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.Eligibility criteriaFull-text, peer-reviewed manuscripts of primary research, conducted in North America; published in the year 2000 or after, in English; and focusing on organised sports were included.Results103 articles met inclusion criteria. Articles were classified into five focus areas: access to and participation in sports (n=45), access to SEM care (n=28), health-related outcomes in SEM (n=24), provider representation in SEM (n=5) and methodology (n=1). Race/ethnicity (n=39), socioeconomic status (n=28) and sex (n=27) were the most studied potential causes of health disparities, whereas sexual orientation (n=5), location (rural/urban/suburban, n=5), education level (n=5), body composition (n=5), gender identity (n=4) and language (n=2) were the least studied. Most articles (n=74) were cross-sectional, conducted on youth (n=55) and originated in the USA (n=90).ConclusionHealth disparity research relevant to SEM in North America is limited. The overall volume and breadth of research required to identify patterns in a heterogeneous sports landscape, which can then be used to inform positive change, need expansion. Intentional research focused on assessing the intersectionality, causes and consequences of health disparities in SEM is necessary.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Focus areas and methodological characteristics of North American-based health disparity research in sports medicine: a scoping review

Kliethermes,

Asif,

Blauwet

et al. 2024

Br J Sports Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Community-based organizations (CBOs) may be especially important in expanding sports access, as community culture is a key driver of decisions to eliminate existing pay-to-play athletics programming (Heinze & Zdroik, 2018). CBOs are a class of small-scale nonprofits deriving their membership and much of their contributions directly from the local community (Jones, Edwards, Bocarro, Bunds, & Smith, 2017).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Consultation with a community-based organization serving urban youth: A case study.

Wycoff¹

2021

Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Community-based organizations (CBOs), part of a class of small-scale nonprofits deriving their membership and much of their contributions from the local community, are often led by individuals with expertise in a particular field and passion for the service their organizations provide to program recipients. This leadership provides great strength for CBOs, but the lack of management and other skills can often hinder efforts to design and implement expanded programs that maximize good and ensure organizational sustainability. This instrumental case study describes a 6-month consultation with a CBO in New York that provided access to sports for underserved high school students. It details the consultant's attempts to apply theory to practice and respond to the shifting contexts of the CBO and community through a flexible, recursive consultation approach. Through application of utilization-focused evaluation methods and a modified program planning and evaluation framework, the consultant provides insights for other consultants of CBOs, specifically related to questioning organizational assumptions, cocreating and iteratively assessing the aims of a consultation, and balancing the need to respect CBO leadership and challenge assumptions-based thinking that impedes sustainability and growth. The article also highlights the key similarities and differences between CBOs and start-ups in terms of the organizational life cycle and problems they are likely to encounter. What's It Mean? Implications for Consulting PsychologyCommunity-based organizations (CBOs) provide integral services and manage multiple stakeholder and participant groups in a complex system. Leadership, often driven by passion but without specific management expertise, may struggle to manage this complexity when designing programs and attempting to achieve growth and sustainability. This instrumental case study describes the application of theorybased consulting methods to address needs for one such CBO, with insights that could be applied to consultation with similar organizations. I thank Dr. Charles Maher for his mentorship and support with this project.

show abstract

Is “school sport” associated with school belongingness? Testing the influence of school sport policy

Jones

Hyun

Edwards

et al. 2020

Sport Management Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

School board decision-making and the elimination of sport participation fees

Cited by 8 publications

References 27 publications

Focus areas and methodological characteristics of North American-based health disparity research in sports medicine: a scoping review

Focus areas and methodological characteristics of North American-based health disparity research in sports medicine: a scoping review

Consultation with a community-based organization serving urban youth: A case study.

Is “school sport” associated with school belongingness? Testing the influence of school sport policy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About