2017
DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.18999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School choice and local embeddedness in Brussels: the neighbourhood effect assessed through administrative files

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new Francophone geographie de l'enseignement has extended to Belgium and directly links to international debates. Empirical research projects are carried out not only in France and Belgium (Marissal 2017;Danhier & Devleeshouwer 2017), but also the United States (Nafaa, 2017).…”
Section: Dispersing Geographical Thoughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new Francophone geographie de l'enseignement has extended to Belgium and directly links to international debates. Empirical research projects are carried out not only in France and Belgium (Marissal 2017;Danhier & Devleeshouwer 2017), but also the United States (Nafaa, 2017).…”
Section: Dispersing Geographical Thoughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introducing quasi-market criteria in education seems to expand the influence of locality. This especially counts for those populations inhabiting deprived areas where the chances of mobility are reduced (Boterman, 2017;Danhier & Devleeshouwer, 2017). In other words, neighborhoods with low levels of socioeconomic deprivation will have well performing schools thanks to students' mobility, while disadvantaged neighborhoods will experience an exacerbation in their schools of the negative effects deriving from segregation dynamics, such as low levels of attainment, downward assimilation (Portes & Rumbaut, 1996), namely a socialization to deviant behaviors, and entrapment in vocational tracks.…”
Section: The Role Of the Institutional Context And School Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, Danhier and Devleeshouwer (2017) notice that the mobility of students is not simply explained by their socioeconomic status or their ethnicity, but depends also on the density of the school offer around the student's house: students living in neighborhoods with few schools and far away from other neighborhoods with a great offer are more likely to move. A city that shows a peculiar pattern in this sense is Brussels: 'as the deprived neighbourhoods are concentrated in the centre of Brussels, the students from these neighbourhoods can access more easily a larger school offer.…”
Section: School Choice: a Middle-class Privilegementioning
confidence: 99%