2013
DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2013.813458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School leadership effects revisited: a review of empirical studies guided by indirect-effect models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
53
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that different principal leadership behaviors were not predictive of IT integration alludes to the indirect, mediated effects that school leaders have on school and student outcomes [56]. The school effectiveness literature has found that principals impact student achievement indirectly by developing the school’s instructional capacity (setting school vision; supporting and monitoring teaching processes; and building systems, structures, and processes) so that teachers at the frontline of teaching are better supported to teach effectively [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding that different principal leadership behaviors were not predictive of IT integration alludes to the indirect, mediated effects that school leaders have on school and student outcomes [56]. The school effectiveness literature has found that principals impact student achievement indirectly by developing the school’s instructional capacity (setting school vision; supporting and monitoring teaching processes; and building systems, structures, and processes) so that teachers at the frontline of teaching are better supported to teach effectively [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With its early roots in transformational leadership theory (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Moorman, & Fetter, 1990), this model has been subject to considerable testing with original empirical evidence (e.g., Leithwood & Jantzi, 1999a, 1999b, 2000a, 2000b and has gradually evolved to include, as well, central elements of instructional leadership. It is now an "integrated" model (Printy, Marks, & Bowers, 2010) widely used by other researchers to help frame their inquiries (e.g., Hendriks & Scheerens, 2013) and by some large education systems to guide their leadership policies (e.g., Ontario; see Leithwood, 2012) This study is the latest in a series aimed at systematically broadening and deepening the evidence about this integrated leadership model. These studies strive to move beyond the original empirical data used in the development and evolution of this leadership model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most "indirect effect" studies are about school leadership effects (Hendriks & Scheerens, 2013). Causal pathways across the levels depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Modelling Educational Effectiveness Hierarchicallymentioning
confidence: 99%