2009
DOI: 10.4324/9780203870532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School Leadership - Heads on the Block?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of audit cultures and neoliberal education regimes on the shaping of school leadership has been the subject of considerable scholarship in recent years (see, for example, Thomson, 2004, Fitzgerald, 2008, Thomson, 2009, Blackmore, 2011, Niesche, 2011. Much of this scholarship recognises the complexity and messiness of these impacts as the contemporary role of the principal is framed by regimes of audit, accountability and language where concepts such as quality, standards and quantifiable improvement are 'framed in such a way as to make any alternative agendas look to be unnecessary and, if pursued, seditious' (Gunter and Forrester, 2010, p.59).…”
Section: Understanding Principals' Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of audit cultures and neoliberal education regimes on the shaping of school leadership has been the subject of considerable scholarship in recent years (see, for example, Thomson, 2004, Fitzgerald, 2008, Thomson, 2009, Blackmore, 2011, Niesche, 2011. Much of this scholarship recognises the complexity and messiness of these impacts as the contemporary role of the principal is framed by regimes of audit, accountability and language where concepts such as quality, standards and quantifiable improvement are 'framed in such a way as to make any alternative agendas look to be unnecessary and, if pursued, seditious' (Gunter and Forrester, 2010, p.59).…”
Section: Understanding Principals' Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A friend who comes without the 'heavy baggage' of accountability of government carried by the SIP, however, can offer to a school principal the tools and self-confidence to engage a sharper-edged critique, to privilege the important over the urgent, the long term over the short term, the educational over the expedient. This is, however, essentially subversive, and subversion tends to be a risky business, especially where principals face the task alone, with their own 'head on the block' (Thomson, 2009). Without the confidence afforded by mutual solidarity within the school and the support of an ideologically unfettered critical friend, venturing beyond policy mandate and challenging the tired mantras of policy-think succession will remain a hazardous prospect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomson (2009, 2010) draw on cultural studies and popular media as a lens through which to explore educational leadership (see also Gunter 1997, Thomson 2009). The television 'makeover' of women is a metaphor for leadership development (Gunter and Thomson 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%