2017
DOI: 10.3386/w23463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School Performance, Accountability and Waiver Reforms: Evidence from Louisiana

Abstract: We would like to acknowledge financial support from the Spencer, Walton, and WT Grant Foundations. We also express appreciation for comments provided by seminar participants at Stanford University and by participants at the AEFP and APPAM research conferences. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This picture is largely consistent with emerging evidence from other states on Focusschool reforms (Dee & Dizon-Ross, 2017). A recent report from the U.S. Government…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This picture is largely consistent with emerging evidence from other states on Focusschool reforms (Dee & Dizon-Ross, 2017). A recent report from the U.S. Government…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast to these federally sanctioned approaches to turnaround, some states engaged in alternative efforts to improve their lowest performing schools under NCLB waivers (Bonilla & Dee, 2020; Dee & Dizon-Ross, 2017; Dougherty & Weiner, 2019). These state turnaround approaches can be characterized by the use of school accountability systems to identify the schools most in need of technical assistance (Dee & Dizon-Ross, 2017).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many accountability studies have focused in school performance consequences (Dee & Dizon-Ross, 2017;Hanushek & Raymond, 2005;Dee & Jacob, 2011), and some have analyzed the effect of accountability pressures on school policies and practices. Rouse et al (2013) and Elacqua et al (2016) show that schools under high accountability pressures in Florida and Chile modified some of their internal practices and policies in educationally meaningful ways.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%