2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(02)00060-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School resources and student achievement revisited: new evidence from panel data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
34
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…14 In a study examining the performance of Finnish senior secondary school students for the years 1990-1998, Häkkinen, Kirjavainen and Uusitalo (2003) find that changes in school spending did not have a signficant effect on test scores. this is consistent with the conclusion of Hanushek that there is no systematic evidence that more school resources improve student learning.…”
Section: Possible Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 In a study examining the performance of Finnish senior secondary school students for the years 1990-1998, Häkkinen, Kirjavainen and Uusitalo (2003) find that changes in school spending did not have a signficant effect on test scores. this is consistent with the conclusion of Hanushek that there is no systematic evidence that more school resources improve student learning.…”
Section: Possible Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are, in fact, different results for the studies that investigate the relationship between educational resources of schools and academic achievement. Some studies indicate that educational resources of schools do not have an effect on academic achievement of students (Hanushek, 1997;Hanushek & Luque, 2003;Hakkinen et al, 2003). On the other hand, some studies say the exact opposite (Card & Krueger, 1996;Greenwald, Hedges & Laine, 1996).…”
Section: Introducationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining three tests have to be selected from the following subjects: the second national language, a foreign language, mathematics, and one from the general studies test battery in sciences and humanities (The Finnish Matriculation Examination, 2014). Previous research results suggest that success in the matriculation examination is mostly explained by previous academic achievement and parental level of education (Häkkinen, Kirjavainen & Uusitalo, 2003;Kirjavainen, 2012).…”
Section: Critical Thinking and Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The remaining three tests have to be selected from the following subjects: the second national language, a foreign language, mathematics, and one from the general studies test battery in sciences and humanities (The Finnish Matriculation Examination, 2014). Previous research results suggest that success in the matriculation examination is mostly explained by previous academic achievement and parental level of education (Häkkinen, Kirjavainen & Uusitalo, 2003;Kirjavainen, 2012).In Finland, some studies have focused on developing entrance examination tests that measure a broader range of cognitive skills. For example, in the 1990s the examinations for entry to the University of Helsinki medical school introduced new essay tasks measuring synthesis writing and critical thinking (Lindblom-Ylänne et al 1996;1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%