“…The synthesis of research in STEM education above indicated that any plausible model of STEM leadership must acknowledge the multidimensional nature of this role and accommodate the following characteristics: the centrality of STEM disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge (e.g., Holmlund et al, 2018); a focus on the solution of problems set in real‐world contexts (e.g., Myers & Berkowicz, 2015; Wenner & Settlage, 2015); teachers' and students' dispositions and beliefs that promote ongoing engagement with STEM (e.g., Davis et al, 2019; Dong et al, 2020; Jeffries et al, 2019; Love et al, 2022); the use of tools that support investigatory approaches to teaching and learning (e.g., Dickes & Farris, 2019; Hoyles et al, 2010); and critical thinking capabilities needed to address complex open‐ended situations (e.g., Gómez & Suárez, 2020; Goos et al, 2020; Li et al, 2019; Smetana & Coleman, 2015).…”