2015
DOI: 10.1177/1745499915571708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schooling’s ‘contribution’ to contemporary violent conflict: Review of theoretical ideas and case studies in the field of education and conflict

Abstract: Some argue that the field of study of ‘education and conflict’ has yet to be solidified since its emergence in the 1990s, partly due to the weak theory base. This article reviews the literature on the ‘contribution’ of schooling in contemporary violent conflict, via three strands of theoretical ideas, to demonstrate the validities and limitations of the current theoretical ideas available in the field. The article shows that the literature is skewed toward cases of ethnic conflicts and limited to theoretical i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This excludes decisions natives make over their own schools. I categorize two types, penetrative and shallow, which I operationalize using criteria from literature on education and conflict: curriculum, instructors, language, and enrollment (Matsumoto 2015).…”
Section: Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This excludes decisions natives make over their own schools. I categorize two types, penetrative and shallow, which I operationalize using criteria from literature on education and conflict: curriculum, instructors, language, and enrollment (Matsumoto 2015).…”
Section: Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradox is well known: nation-state sponsored education has two faces. In all too many ways, schools, in what and how they teach and operate, often exacerbate inter-group grievances and enmity, systemic and overt violence (Bellino & Williams, 2017;Bush & Saltarelli, 2000;Davies, 2011;Matsumoto, 2015;Paulson, 2008). Yet simultaneously, school institutions are sites of encounter and struggle among competing visions-both symbols and resources for people's hopes and dreams for social development and peace (Bellino & Williams, 2017;Bush & Saltarelli, 2000;Davies, 2011;Matsumoto, 2015;Paulson, 2008).…”
Section: Forewordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all too many ways, schools, in what and how they teach and operate, often exacerbate inter-group grievances and enmity, systemic and overt violence (Bellino & Williams, 2017;Bush & Saltarelli, 2000;Davies, 2011;Matsumoto, 2015;Paulson, 2008). Yet simultaneously, school institutions are sites of encounter and struggle among competing visions-both symbols and resources for people's hopes and dreams for social development and peace (Bellino & Williams, 2017;Bush & Saltarelli, 2000;Davies, 2011;Matsumoto, 2015;Paulson, 2008). The symbolic importance of textbooks, inspiring agentic citizen action for or against peace, is especially evident in the Pakistan case, where a textbook's respectful recognition of a Pakistani Nobel Prize winner from a stigmatized minority sect of Islam provoked protests (Kalhoro & Cromwell, this volume), and in the Jordan case, where protests arose over a woman portrayed in a textbook without her head covered (Shahzadeh, this volume).…”
Section: Forewordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When they are shallow, the system makes room for local identities. I operationalize education policies using criterion from literature on education and conflict: curriculum, instructors, language, and enrollment (Matsumoto, 2015). Curriculum refers to what is taught in classrooms.…”
Section: Theory and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%