2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1608.00034
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schur complement Domain Decomposition Methods for the solution of multiple scattering problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first approach consist of hierarchical elimination from the DDM linear system via Schur complements of the Robin data corresponding to interior subdomain interfaces. This idea was presented recently as a hierarchical merging of Robin-to-Robin (RtR) maps [17] in the context of scattering from variable media with smooth index of refraction, and was shown to be equivalent to hierarchical elimination of interior Robin data from the DDM linear system corresponding to multiple scattering [28]. The advantage of the Schur complement DDM is that at each stage inverses of relatively small matrices need be computed, and these can be performed in a hierarchical fashion that optimizes the computational cost without compromising the inherent parallelism of DDM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach consist of hierarchical elimination from the DDM linear system via Schur complements of the Robin data corresponding to interior subdomain interfaces. This idea was presented recently as a hierarchical merging of Robin-to-Robin (RtR) maps [17] in the context of scattering from variable media with smooth index of refraction, and was shown to be equivalent to hierarchical elimination of interior Robin data from the DDM linear system corresponding to multiple scattering [28]. The advantage of the Schur complement DDM is that at each stage inverses of relatively small matrices need be computed, and these can be performed in a hierarchical fashion that optimizes the computational cost without compromising the inherent parallelism of DDM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%