2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-8176-8277-4_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schur–Weyl-Type Duality for Quantized gl(1|1), the Burau Representation of Braid Groups, and Invariants of Tangled Graphs

Abstract: We show that the Schur-Weyl type duality between gl(1|1) and GLn gives a natural representation-theoretic setting for the relation between reduced and non-reduced Burau representations. %endquote

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of (2), we interpret Theorem 1 as a Schur-Weyl duality between U i .sl 2 / and the reduced SL 2 .C/-twisted Burau representation. This extends a similar result for U q .gl.1j1// and abelian SL 2 .C/-representations due to N. Reshetikhin, C. Stroppel, and B. Webster [23].…”
Section: Schur-weyl Duality For the Burau Representationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Because of (2), we interpret Theorem 1 as a Schur-Weyl duality between U i .sl 2 / and the reduced SL 2 .C/-twisted Burau representation. This extends a similar result for U q .gl.1j1// and abelian SL 2 .C/-representations due to N. Reshetikhin, C. Stroppel, and B. Webster [23].…”
Section: Schur-weyl Duality For the Burau Representationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In particular, if ∆ can be seen as a quantum invariant [23,25,30], it is in essence a classical invariant derived from a presentation matrix of the rst homology group of the innite cyclic covering of the complement of a given link in S 3 [1]. Therefore we can ask if some of ∆'s homological properties extend to LG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• In the braid group/R-matrix formalism for U q (sl(N |M )) and U q (sl(1|1)) [25,34,35] in particular in [36], where it was also noticed that the various formulas for U q (sl(N |M )), like the values of Casimir invariants, skein relation, etc. looked as ones for U q (sl(N − M )).…”
Section: Perturbative Analysis Of the Alexander Polynomialmentioning
confidence: 99%